'Bareback' sex ten times more risky for passive partner of HIV+ man than active partner

This article is more than 23 years old. Click here for more recent articles on this topic

Receptive unprotected anal intercourse carries ten

times the risk of insertive unprotected anal intercourse, according to a US

study of new infections amongst gay men. However, 15% of those infected reported

Glossary

receptive

Receptive anal intercourse refers to the act of being penetrated during anal intercourse. The receptive partner is the ‘bottom’.

unprotected anal intercourse (UAI)

In relation to sex, a term previously used to describe sex without condoms. However, we now know that protection from HIV can be achieved by taking PrEP or the HIV-positive partner having an undetectable viral load, without condoms being required. The term has fallen out of favour due to its ambiguity.

insertive

Insertive anal intercourse refers to the act of penetration during anal intercourse. The insertive partner is the ‘top’. 

seroconversion

The transition period from infection with HIV to the detectable presence of HIV antibodies in the blood. When seroconversion occurs (usually within a few weeks of infection), the result of an HIV antibody test changes from HIV negative to HIV positive. Seroconversion may be accompanied with flu-like symptoms.

 

epidemiology

The study of the causes of a disease, its distribution within a population, and measures for control and prevention. Epidemiology focuses on groups rather than individuals.

just one or two episodes of UAI during the two year study.

The per-contact risk of acquiring HIV infection

during unprotected receptive anal intercourse with a man known to be

HIV-positive was 0.82% (eight in one thousand), whilst the per contact risk of

acquiring HIV from unprotected insertive anal intercourse with any partner was

more than ten times lower (0.6 in one thousand). Receptive oral sex that

involved ejaculation carried a per-contact risk of 0.4 in one

thousand.

Sixty seroconversions were reported amongst 2,189 gay

men recruited to the study between 1992 and 1994 in three American cities. Nine

seroconversions were reported to have occurred after just one or two episodes of

UAI, suggesting that the per contact risk is highly unpredictable. Only 45%

reported unprotected receptive anal intercourse during the year preceding

seroconversion - condom failure appears to have accounted for a substantial

proportion of infections.

The authors also note that the per-contact risk of

unprotected receptive anal intercourse is roughly twice as high as that

estimated for needlestick injuries. The authors argue that this level of

per-contact risk justifies the provision of post-exposure prohylaxis to gay and

bisexual men

 

Reference

 

Vittinghoff E et al. Per-contact risk of human

immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners. American

Journal of Epidemiology 150: 306-311, 1999.