96 weeks results from two African studies confirm dolutegravir non-inferiority but highlight continued weight gain

Image: Riccardo Mayer/Shutterstock.com

Last week, at the 23rd International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2020: Virtual), 96-week data from two major studies conducted in South Africa and Cameroon confirmed that dolutegravir is an important therapeutic option for people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa and other resource-limited settings. However, both studies highlighted the drug’s impact on weight gain.

The ADVANCE trial

Dr Simiso Sokhela from the University of the Witswatersrand presented the 96-week primary efficacy results of the ADVANCE study, about which we have reported several times in recent years.

ADVANCE is a large, open-label, 192-week randomised comparison of the following combinations, taken as first-line antiretroviral therapies:

  • dolutegravir/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (DTG/TDF/FTC).
  • dolutegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (DTG/TAF/FTC).
  • efavirenz/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (EFV/TDF/FTC), which was the standard of care.

It was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in a South African population of people living with HIV, among which non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance is estimated to range from 5 to 15%, as well as whether a nucleoside backbone regimen containing TAF reduced the risk of kidney and bone toxicities in this setting.

Glossary

nucleoside

A precursor to a building block of DNA or RNA. Nucleosides must be chemically changed into nucleotides before they can be used to make DNA or RNA. 

reverse transcriptase

A retroviral enzyme which converts genetic material from RNA into DNA, an essential step in the lifecycle of HIV. Several classes of anti-HIV drugs interfere with this stage of HIV’s life cycle: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). 

first-line therapy

The regimen used when starting treatment for the first time.

osteopenia

A condition in which bone mineral density is lower than normal, but less severe than osteoporosis.

osteoporosis

Bone disease characterised by a decrease in bone mineral density and bone mass, resulting in an increased risk of fracture (a broken bone).

A total of 1053 participants who were antiretroviral-naïve and had a viral load superior to 500 copies were enrolled and assigned to one of the three arms. Baseline characteristics were similar across all three arms: 60% female; median age 32 years, weight 66kg, body mass index 24 (kg/m2) and CD4 counts of between 322 cells/mm3 and 349 cells/mm3.  Approximately 20% of all participants had a viral load above 100,000 copies.

Dr Sokhela clarified that the last viral load measurement for each patient in the week 96-time window was used as main efficacy endpoint for this analysis, and that patients with missing data were classified as treatment failures. She also said that treatment arms were compared for non-inferiority, then for superiority.

Participants in the two dolutegravir-arms achieved viral load suppression faster than those in the efavirenz (standard-of-care) arm. Of note, the proportion of patients with a viral load below 50 copies was similar across all arms by week 24, and this similarity has been maintained up to week 96.

Very few participants in any arm experienced virological failure. Emergent nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and NNRTI resistance was observed in the standard-of-care and the DTG/TDF arm, but not in the DTG/TAF arm. Importantly, no patient showing virological failure developed any integrase inhibitor resistance mutation. 

In general, reported adverse events were slightly higher in the efavirenz arm. There were 96 grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the efavirenz arm (vs 60 in the DTG/TDF arm and 54 in the DTG/TAF arm), with many of the extra cases being short-term elevations of liver enzymes.

Across all arms, there were few adverse kidney events, although higher numbers were found in the DTG/TDF arm, including 46 grade 3 to 4 creatinine clearance events (vs 14 in the efavirenz arm and 6 in the TAF arm).

DEXA scan bone density measurements performed at baseline, week 48 and week 96, revealed that the DTG/TAF arm had the smallest proportion of participants developing hip or lumbar spine osteopenia, while the efavirenz one had the highest.

By week 96, men had gained more weight in the two dolutegravir arms than in the standard-of-care arm.

  • DTG/TAF/FTC: + 5.2 kg (average weight gain over three times more than in EFV arm)
  • DTG/TDF/FTC: + 3.6 kg
  • EFV/TDF/FTC: + 1.4 kg.

As for women, those in the TAF arm gained significantly more weight than those in the other two arms:

  • DTG/TAF/FTC: + 8.2 kg
  • DTG/TDF/FTC: + 4.6 kg
  • EFV/TDF/FTC: + 3.2 kg.

This confirmed the 48-week data presented at the IAS 2019 conference. Additionally, in both men and women, the incomplete 144-week data (from a smaller number of participants) suggested a persistent upward trajectory, particularly in the two dolutegravir arms.

Body composition changes were more pronounced in women than in men. Weight increases were largely fat rather than lean body mass, and were distributed in the trunk and limbs, in participants in all three arms of the study. Women gained significantly more fat than men.

Likely linked to the weight gain, more participants developed metabolic syndrome in the DTG/TAF and DTG/TDF arms.  

In her conclusion, Dr Sokhela commented that the study results illustrated the complexity of programmes in South Africa, as the country was transitioning to dolutegravir-based regimens. She added that the results supported the current World Health Organization (WHO) treatment guidelines, which reserved the regimen containing TAF only for patients with osteoporosis or impaired renal function.

The NAMSAL study

Dr Charles Kouanfack of the University of Dschang presented the 96-week results of the NAMSAL/ANRS 12313 trial. The 48-week results showed that dolutegravir was non-inferior, in terms of efficacy and safety, to efavirenz 400mg, and Kouanfack wanted to see if this was maintained to 96 weeks.

The study enrolled 616 adults living with HIV in Cameroon who had never taken antiretroviral therapy and had a viral load of over 1000 copies. Participants were randomised to receive either:

  • dolutegravir/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine (DTG/TDF/3TC).
  • efavirenz/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine (EFV/TDF/3TC).

Of note, the lower efavirenz dose of 400mg was used, whereas it was 600mg in ADVANCE.

Baseline characteristics were identical in both groups. Two-thirds of the study population were women, with median age of 36 years and a median CD4 cell count of 281 cells/mm3. Two-thirds of study participants had a high viral load (above 100,000 copies/ml), 30.5% had a viral load above 500,000 copies/ml and the median viral load in the study population was 5.3 log10 copies/ml.

Therefore, at baseline, NAMSAL study participants were more advanced, immunologically and virologically, than those in the ADVANCE trial.

At week 96, viral load was below 50 copies for 74% of people on dolutegravir and 72% of those on efavirenz, and the difference between the groups was not statistically significant.

Virological suppression, as per the WHO criteria of less than 1000 copies, was 84% and 82% in the dolutegravir and the efavirenz groups, respectively. As at week 48, people with higher viral loads at entry in the trial had a poorer response to both regimens.

At week 96, six participants showed resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs, among whom three had switched to efavirenz after the WHO 2018 alert on potential dolutegravir safety issues in women at the time of conception.

Weight gain already at week 48 persisted by week 96, and was over 6kg in participants on dolutegravir, and over 4kg in those on efavirenz. It was more pronounced in women than in men, and it was confirmed through different parameters. For example, weight gain of 10% or more went from 38% of participants on dolutegravir at week 48, to 45% at week 96; while in the efavirenz arm, it went from 29% to 33%.

There were 58 (19%) and 46 (15%) reported adverse events in the dolutegravir and the efavirenz arms, respectively. 

In his conclusion, Dr Kouanfack commented that by confirming the non-inferiority of dolutegravir, already seen at week 48, the 96 weeks results further supported the WHO recommendation to use the drug as a preferred first-line regimen and efavirenz 400 mg-based regimen as an alternative. However, he also insisted on the need to pursue the research on weight gain and other adverse events. 

References

Sokhela S et al. The ADVANCE trial: Phase 3, randomised comparison of TAF/FTC+DTG, TDF/FTC+DTG or TDF/FTC/EFV for first-line treatment of HIV-1 infection. 23rd International AIDS Conference, abstract OAXLB0104, 2020.

Kouanfack C et al. Dolutegravir- versus low-dose Efavirenz-based regimen for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection in Cameroon: Week 96 results of the ANRS 12313 – NAMSAL trial. 23rd International AIDS Conference, abstract OAB0402, 2020.