Nevirapine rather than efavirenz-based HIV treatment more likely to suppress viral load to zero

This article is more than 12 years old. Click here for more recent articles on this topic

The inclusion of nevirapine rather than efavirenz in an HIV treatment combination was more likely to suppress viral load in the blood to completely undetectable levels, French investigators report in the online edition of AIDS.

A total of 81% of patients taking nevirapine (Viramune) had a viral load below one copy/ml, compared to 55% of individuals treated with efavirenz (Sustiva or Stocrin). The study involved 165 patients and was retrospective. All the patients had had an undetectable viral load for at least six months and were taking either nevirapine or efavirenz in combination with FTC (emtricitabine, Emtriva) and tenofovir (Viread; the two drugs are usually combined in a single pill, Truvada, and are also available co-formulated with efavirenz in Atripla).

A viral load below 50 copies/ml is the current aim of antiretroviral therapy. Viral load tests in routine use cannot detect virus below this level. However, research assays are able to detect extremely low levels of residual viral load.



The presence of virus in the blood.


retrospective study

A type of longitudinal study in which information is collected on what has previously happened to people - for example, by reviewing their medical notes or by interviewing them about past events. 


The physical form in which a drug is manufactured or administered. Examples of formulations include tablets, capsules, powders, and oral and injectable solutions. A drug may be available in multiple formulations.


A test used to measure something.


A precursor to a building block of DNA or RNA. Nucleosides must be chemically changed into nucleotides before they can be used to make DNA or RNA. 

Previous research has suggested that therapy that includes a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) is more likely to suppress viral load to extremely low levels than treatment based on a protease inhibitor. There is also some evidence that nevirapine is more effective at reducing viral load to the lowest levels than efavirenz.

French investigators wanted to gain a better understanding of the impact of nevirapine- or efavirenz-containing regimens on residual viraemia. They therefore designed a retrospective study involving 75 patients treated with nevirapine and 90 individuals taking efavirenz-based therapy.

To be included in the study, patients were required to have had a viral load below 50 copies/ml for at least six months.

Viral load was monitored using an assay capable of detecting virus below one copy/ml.

Overall, 81% of patients taking nevirapine had a viral load of zero compared to 56% of individuals treated with efavirenz.

After controlling for potentially confounding factors, the investigators found that treatment with nevirapine was significantly more likely to suppress viral load below one copy/ml than therapy with efavirenz (odds ratio [OR]: 2.85; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.1, p  = 0.005). The only other factor associated with a viral load of zero was the duration of viral load suppression below 50 copies/ml (OR: 2.07; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5, p  = 0.005).

The investigators believe that research now shows “the stronger ability of nevirapine than efavirenz to better control residual viremia, in patients presenting with low viremia.” They suggest that this is because nevirapine is better able to penetrate into anatomical sites that may harbour “reservoirs” of virus.

“The clinical relevance of having a viral load below 1 copy/ml has yet to be shown,” conclude the researchers, who call for studies “to explore, for example, the relationship between the level of residual viremia and systemic inflammatory or immune activation markers.”


Haim-Boukobza S et al. Higher efficacy of nevirapine than efavirenz to achieve HIV-1 plasma viral load below 1 copy/ml. AIDS 25: online edition, DOI: 10. 10957/QAD0b013e3283427de3, 2010 (click here for the free abstract).