People with HIV/HCV co-infection see good cure rates in real-world practice in Madrid

Juan Gonzalez Garcia, presenting at AASLD 2016. Photo by Liz Highleyman, hivandhepatitis.com
Published: 23 November 2016

More than 90% of HIV-positive people treated with direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C – including many with liver cirrhosis – achieved sustained virological response and few discontinued treatment due to side-effects, showing that real-world clinical practice can produce results as good as those seen in formal clinical trials, according to results from a Spanish study presented at the 2016 AASLD Liver Meeting this month in Boston.

HIV-positive people with hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection experience more rapid liver disease progression, on average, and did not respond as well as HIV-negative people to interferon-based hepatitis C treatment.

New direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) used in interferon-free regimens have made treatment simpler, better tolerated and much more effective. Clinical trials showed that DAAs work as well for HIV-positive as for HIV-negative people with hepatitis C – so well that people with co-infection are no longer considered a 'special population' – although they need to be aware of potential drug-drug interactions with antiretrovirals. But outcomes in real-life clinical practice sometimes do not match those of formal drug trials in which participants are carefully selected and may receive more intensive monitoring and support.

Juan Gonzalez-García of Hospital La Paz and colleagues evaluated treatment outcomes in the Madrid Coinfection Registry (Madrid-CoRe), a prospective registry of all individuals with HIV/HCV co-infection receiving DAA-based hepatitis C treatment at hospitals of the Madrid Regional Health Service, which are required to register their co-infected patients.

The analysis included 2030 adults with co-infection who started treatment between November 2014 and May 2016 and who completed therapy and had long enough follow-up to determine sustained virological response, or continued undetectable HCV viral load at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Relapse was defined as a rebound of HCV RNA levels after the end of treatment.

Nearly 80% of people in the registry were men and the mean age was 50 years. Most (95%) were on combination antiretroviral therapy and the median CD4 count was high at 570 cells/mm3. The most common HCV genotype was 1a (40%), followed by genotype 4 (22%), genotype 1b (16%) and genotype 3 (15%).

More than half (55%) did not have cirrhosis, but 37% had compensated cirrhosis and 7% had decompensated liver disease; 7% had experienced severe extra-hepatic manifestations of HCV infection. In addition, 15 people had a history of hepatocellular carcinoma, 17 had undergone liver transplantation and seven were on a transplant waiting list.

Over 60% were being treated for hepatitis C for the first time. Nearly a third included ribavirin in their regimen. The most common DAA regimen was sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (Harvoni), used by 63%, followed by sofosbuvir (Sovaldi) plus daclatasvir (Daklinza) and the paritaprevir-based '3D' regimen (Viekirax + Exviera), both at 15%. Smaller numbers used the paritaprevir '2D' regimen (Viekirax alone), sofosbuvir plus simeprevir (Olysio) or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin.

The overall SVR12 rate in an intention-to-treat analysis was 92.0%. Cure rates were similar across HCV genotypes: 92.2% for genotype 1a, 93.5% for 1b, 91.9% for genotype 3 and 90.4% for genotype 4.

SVR12 rates were 93.7% for people without cirrhosis and 91.5% for those with compensated cirrhosis, but declined to 80.8% for those with decompensated liver disease. Cure rates were good for people without cirrhosis regardless of genotype, but dropped for people with compensated cirrhosis and especially for those with decompensated cirrhosis. People with cirrhosis with genotype 1a (77.5%) or 3 (77.3%) had the lowest sustained response rates.

Five people (0.2%) experienced HCV viral breakthrough while on treatment and 89 (4.4%) experienced post-treatment viral rebound. In response to a question, Dr Gonzalez-García said the researchers did not have genotypic data from people with virological failure to determine whether they experienced relapse or HCV reinfection.

Treatment was generally well tolerated and most people completed therapy. Fourteen people (0.7%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events and 36 (1.8%) did so for other reasons. Nineteen people (0.9%) died during treatment or follow-up, 17 of whom had cirrhosis.

In a multivariate analysis the only significant predictors of treatment failure were having decompensated cirrhosis – but not compensated cirrhosis – and use of certain DAA regimens (sofosbuvir plus simeprevir, sofosbuvir plus ribavirin or simeprevir plus daclatasvir).

"In this large prospective cohort of HIV/HCV co-infected persons, 45% of whom had liver cirrhosis, the SVR12 [rate] of DAA-based therapy for HCV infection was >90%," the researchers concluded, and < 1% discontinued therapy due to adverse events.

These results confirm that treatment outcomes are similar for people with HIV/HCV co-infection and people with HCV alone, Dr Gonzalez-García said, adding that the lower response rate for people with decompensated liver disease is a reason to start treatment earlier.

Reference

Gil-Martin A et al (Gonzalez-García J presenting). Real-world outcomes with new HCV antivirals in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects: Madrid Coinfection Registry (Madrid-CoRE) findings. The 67th Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: The Liver Meeting, abstract 78, Boston, 2016.

View abstract

Hepatitis information

For more information on hepatitis visit infohep.org.

Infohep is a project we're working on with the World Hepatitis Alliance and the European Liver Patients Association.

Visit infohep.org >

Related news selected from other sources

More editors' picks on hepatitis C treatment >
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.