HIV-positive people have heart attacks younger but receive later care

Christie Kaiser and Charles Hicks © Liz Highleyman /
Published: 10 September 2012

People with HIV had heart attacks at a younger age than HIV-negative individuals and were about 50% more likely to die after an acute myocardial infarction, according to a study presented yesterday at the 52nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) in San Francisco. A related analysis found that HIV-positive people received coronary catheterisation at a later stage, after they had more advanced heart damage.

Several studies have shown that people with HIV are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease, though it is not yet clear whether this is due to persistent viral infection, resulting immune activation and inflammation, side-effects of antiretroviral therapy, traditional risk factors or some combination of these factors.

Inflammation and metabolic changes can contribute to atherosclerosis, a process in which artery walls thicken and lose their elasticity. Over time, this leads to impaired blood flow to the heart and brain, which can result in a heart attack or stroke. Various procedures may be used to open blocked vessels, but outcomes are better if these procedures are done early.

HIV and heart attacks

Daniel Pearce from Loma Linda University in California, and colleagues, compared outcomes between HIV-positive and HIV-negative people hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction. They used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample collected from 1997 through to 2006, which approximates a 20% sample of all US hospitalisations.

The analysis included nearly 1.5 million adult participants who spent at least one day in hospital after acute myocardial infarction; 5984 of them were HIV-positive. Most were white men age 55 or older with private health insurance. Co-morbidities were common, including hypertension (51%), diabetes (24%), congestive heart failure (20%) and chronic pulmonary disease (16%).

The in-hospital mortality rate after myocardial infarction was 4.3% for people with HIV, compared with 2.4% for HIV-negative participants. In addition to HIV status, male sex, older age and greater co-morbidity were also significant predictors of death.

HIV-positive people had a significant 43% higher likelihood of death after hospitalisation for myocardial infarction compared with HIV-negative people. After adjusting for sex, age and race/ethnicity, people with HIV had 64% higher mortality. Adjusting for both demographic and clinical factors, people with HIV remained at 53% higher risk.

HIV-positive myocardial infarction patients were younger on average than HIV-negative patients – 54 vs 64 years – indicating that they were having heart attacks sooner. HIV-positive people stayed in hospital longer than HIV-negative people on average (six vs five days) and incurred higher costs.

People with HIV had more co-morbidity than HIV negative participants, both overall and for specific conditions, including congestive heart failure (26 vs 20%), kidney disease (13 vs 5%) and mild liver disease (8 vs 1%). However, most other major cardiac and metabolic risk factors – such as hypertension, diabetes, elevated cholesterol and smoking – were less common among people with HIV.

The study also showed that HIV-positive people were significantly less likely than HIV-negative people to undergo common coronary procedures, including catheterisation, coronary arteriography, angiography and bypass surgery.

"A significant additional mortality burden exists" for HIV-positive people receiving in-hospital care for acute myocardial infarction, the researchers concluded, and this group has "significantly lower rates" for the most common in-hospital procedures.

Greater risk of acute myocardial infarction and resulting death in people with HIV may be due to direct pathological effects of HIV, including endothelial inflammation and irritation, platelet dysfunction, activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and thrombosis (clotting), they suggested.

Considering other factors that might play a role, they noted that HIV-positive people as a group are more likely to be drug or alcohol users and are of lower socioeconomic status. However, controlling for these factors did not significantly change the disparity in mortality.

At an ICAAC media briefing, Pearce suggest that maybe HIV is a "hotter" risk factor than smoking, family history and other traditional factors. He added that clinicians managing people with HIV should be more alert for early symptoms such as chest pain, which might not normally raise an alarm in young patients.

Delayed procedures

In the second study, Christie Kaiser and Charles Hicks and colleagues at Duke University Medical Center and the University of North Carolina compared characteristics of HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals undergoing first-time coronary catheterisation. This procedure involves threading a catheter through the blood vessels supplying the heart to diagnose (and sometimes treat) blockages. It is often done when people experience chest pain or have suspected coronary artery disease.

This retrospective analysis included 96 HIV-positive people seen at HIV specialist clinics between January 1996 and March 2012. They were matched with 41 HIV-negative people of the same sex, age and socioeconomic status. All participants were in established care (at least three visits) and did not have a pre-existing cardiovascular disease diagnosis.

The median age was about 50 years, 75% of HIV-positive and 60% of HIV-negative participants were men, and approximately 70% were black. Among the HIV-positive participants, the average CD4 cell count was about 500 cells/mm3. Most were on antiretroviral therapy, but the sample size was too small to do an analysis comparing different drugs.

As in Pearce's study, end-stage kidney disease was more common among HIV positive patients (15 vs 0%), but diabetes was more common in the HIV negative group (23 vs 42%). Rates of hypertension, elevated cholesterol and other traditional cardiovascular risk factors were similar in both groups. In contrast with Pearce's findings – but agreeing with most other studies – people with HIV were more likely to be smokers (51 vs 37%) and they were more likely to use cocaine (17 vs 10%).

More HIV-positive people than HIV-negative people had "significant" coronary artery disease – defined as at least 50% blockage of one or more major blood vessels – at the time of catheterisation (63 vs 54%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

People with HIV were significantly more likely than HIV-negative control patients to undergo cardiac catheterisation on an urgent basis due to unstable angina or myocardial infarction (54 vs 34%). But subsequent clinical management after catheterisation, including bypass surgery (18 vs 23%) and stent placement (52 vs 46%), was the same in both groups.

"Significant coronary artery disease was common in HIV positive patients going for [catheterisation] despite the young median age of 49 years," the researchers concluded.

At the media briefing, Hicks said that it was difficult to find enough matching HIV-negative people who underwent catheterisation at such a young age because of suspected coronary artery disease.

Kaiser added that it was also difficult to find matched HIV-negative people who were plugged into care; the team had had to exclude 75% of potential participants because they were not in established care. "Young men of low socioeconomic class don’t go to the doctor," she said, adding that being HIV positive might provide an entry into care for other conditions.

"The rates of cardiac stent placement and use [of] cardiac bypass surgery were nearly identical between those with HIV infection and the control population, implying that provider bias against aggressively treating HIV-infected individuals was not an issue," the researchers summarised in an ICAAC press release. "Instead, we suspect that specialist health care providers caring for HIV-infected patients are less experienced than primary care providers at recognizing and treating cardiac risk factors and coronary artery disease."

Hicks suggested that either HIV specialist doctors could become more broadly educated about general medicine, or perhaps many HIV patients could be followed by a generalist for primary care, only going back to specialists when they have HIV-related issues.

"We don't want to be using these tools after heart damage is already done," he cautioned.


Ani C et al. In-hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction: HIV sero-positive vs. sero-negative individuals. 52nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, abstract H-228, 2012. View the abstract on the conference website.

Kaiser C et al. Early onset and late diagnosis of CAD in HIV+ persons. 52nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, abstract H-229, 2012. View the abstract on the conference website.

Related news selected from other sources

More editors' picks on cardiovascular disease >
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.