Although rates are improving, gay men in
the UK still take HIV tests
less often than their counterparts in comparable countries, and nearly half of
African men with HIV in the UK
still don’t test until they’ve developed AIDS.
In our feature Don’t live in ignorance, we’ll look at what can be done to improve
the situation. But what do the figures actually show?
More than 90% of gay men in the US have
taken a test for HIV at some point, according to community surveys, and more
than 95% in Australia.1 In comparison the annual United Kingdom Gay Men’s Sex Survey
showed that the proportion of UK gay men who have ever taken a test rose to 66%
in 2007 (the last year we have full figures for).2
People don’t test often enough, either. The
most recent Gay Men’s Sex Survey –admittedly
with data collected in 2005 –found
that the proportion of gay men who’d taken a test in the last twelve months
was, at 32%, far lower in the UK than it was in Australia or the US.3
In the US three-quarters of gay men have tested in the last year, while in
Australia half have taken a test in the last six months.
In the UK African community, testing rates
are lower than in gay men. In the 2007 BASSLine Survey of over 4000 Africans in
the UK,
only 47% of respondents had ever had an HIV test.4
Late diagnosis
There are two reasons why it’s important
that as many people with HIV are tested as possible. One is that once people are
diagnosed, the majority immediately start taking fewer HIV transmission risks.
A bit late from their point of view – but highly protective of others. The US
Centers for Disease Control have estimated that in the immediate post-diagnosis
period people reduce their risk behaviour by 70%,5 and a study that
followed a group of women living with HIV in the slums of Nairobi found that they maintained a
long-term reduction in their risk behaviour of 30 to 40%.6
The earlier you are diagnosed, the more
likely you are still to be in the acute stage when you’re very infectious: between
a quarter and a half of all HIV is acquired from people who have recently
caught it themselves.7, 8, 9
But the most important reason to increase
testing rates is to diagnose people before they become ill. The HPA’s statistics10
show that a quarter of gay men, a third of newly diagnosed people overall, and
nearly a half (47%) of heterosexual men are diagnosed with CD4 counts below
200, and the British HIV Association11 found that quarter of all HIV-related
deaths were directly due to patients being diagnosed too late to respond to
treatment.
People who died due to late diagnosis were
twice as likely to be young (under 30) than people who died for other reasons,
and more than twice as likely to be ‘non-white’.
Some successes
It is important to say that the testing
situation is improving and that there is already some evidence of culture
shift. In Scotland,
in 2002 only half of the gay men interviewed in community surveys had ever
taken an HIV test. In contrast, yet-to-be-published figures from 2008 now show
that three-quarters have ever tested and nearly half have tested in the last
year.12,13 ,14 In the Gay Men’s Sex Survey, which may sample a
broader range of gay men, the 2007 figure of two-thirds of respondents having
ever tested is an increase from under half in 2001. In gay men the average CD4
count at diagnosis has risen from 350 in 2000 to 410 in 2007, and in
heterosexual men from 150 to 230.15
We have high testing rates in some groups.
One of these is pregnant women, where the UK has one of the best rates in the
world: about 95% of women are tested during pregnancy. As a result the
proportion of babies infected by HIV-positive mothers has fallen from 16% in
1998 to about 4% now (though this figure could still be improved).
Similarly, testing by people who go for
sexual health check-ups has risen. In 1998 only half of gay men and a quarter
of heterosexuals attending genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics included an HIV
test in their check-up. This proportion has now risen to 86% in gay men and 95%
in heterosexuals.
But not everyone goes to sexual health
clinics, or needs to. What can we do about offering HIV tests in other places? In
Don’t live in ignorance, we’ll find
out.