Interventions which reduce the need for people to attend
clinics are proving highly successful in retaining people in care and
supporting adherence to HIV medication in southern Africa, the 21st
International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2016) heard last week.
Measures to reduce the burden of people seeking health care are
also critical to improving the capacity of health systems to manage growing
numbers of patients, numerous presenters at the conference confirmed. The new
wave of interventions – described as 'differentiated care' in guidelines – are
intended to reduce clinic visits, waiting times and monitoring requirements.
The benefits for patients include less time spent waiting in
clinics and travelling to clinics, fewer out-of-pocket travel expenses and less
time off work due to clinic attendance, and more support in the community for
adherence to medication.
The benefits for health services come in the form of
increased capacity to deal with growing patient numbers, more time to
concentrate on patients with complex needs, and better retention of patients in
care due to the use of community health workers and other community-level
mechanisms for supporting treatment.
In new guidance issued ahead of the 21st
International AIDS Conference, the World Heath Organization (WHO) urged national
treatment programmes to begin thinking in terms of delivering treatment to four
different groups of patients, and tailoring services for each group
accordingly. The four groups of patients are:
- People presenting when well: new patients who
will need adherence and retention support as they start treatment, and
monitoring during the early months of treatment.
- People with advanced disease: new patients who
present with symptomatic HIV disease or CD4 counts below 200, or who develop
TB, who will need fast-track clinical care and more intensive follow-up.
- Stable patients: people on treatment for at
least one year with undetectable viral load, not pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Unstable patients: people on treatment with
detectable viral load, who need adherence support, possible second or
third-line switches, monitoring for HIV drug resistance.
People can be expected to transition from one group to
another; in the majority of cases from the 'Presenting when well' to the 'Stable' category.
"A one size fits all approach to care is no longer suitable,"
said Gottfried Hirnschall, director of the WHO HIV/AIDS programme, introducing
the guidance.
A new, differentiated approach to care is needed, said Anna
Grimsrud of the International AIDS Society. "We’re not getting the retention in
care that we need, so something is wrong for patients. We need to treat all, so
we will need to treat more people, and in order to reach the 90-90-90 targets,
we need to speed up," she told a pre-conference satellite meeting on
differentiated care.
Differentiated care involves not only the shifting of tasks
to new cadres in the health system, such as community health workers, but the
assumption of responsibility for managing elements of their own care by largely
self-organised patient groups. These mechanisms include the distribution of medication by patient groups, which may require changes in rules in many countries.
"One of the biggest barriers to differentiated care is
regulatory – rules that say this person cannot do this," said Carlos del Rio of
Emory University.
The conference heard findings on a number of models for differentiated care including six-monthly appointments, adherence clubs and community antiretroviral therapy (ART) refill groups.
But Dr Eric Goemaere of Médecins sans Frontières (MSF) warned that community services
like adherence clubs are an extra cost. "Clinics still need to run," he said,
pointing out adherence clubs need to be understood as a mechanism to expand the
volume of patients treated, not as a cost-saving mechanism.
Six-monthly appointments
A review of a switch to six-monthly appointments for
clinically stable patients in Malawi found that the switch reduced attrition from HIV care and saved 30,000 clinician
consultations in one district in 2014 alone. MSF switched from monthly or
three-monthly appointments to six-monthly appointments for clinically stable
patients in its treatment programme in Chiradzulu district as far back as 2008.
Patients obtained drug refills from the pharmacy every three months. The
programme provides care for around 35,000 patients, 95% of whom are now on ART.
The analysis looked at outcomes in 24,802 patients in
treatment since 2008 who were eligible for six-monthly appointments, of which
18% did not take up the option of less frequent clinic visits. Those who did
not enrol were significantly more likely to die or become lost to follow-up
(adjusted odds ratio 3.09, 95% CI 2.47-3.87) possibly an indication that they
were considered unsuitable for switching to less frequent clinical contact,
despite being clinically stable. Overall, only 3% of those who were later
enrolled to six-monthly appointments were lost to care, compared to 35% of
those never enrolled.
As for appointments saved, the analysis showed that a switch
to six-monthly appointments only began to have a substantial impact on the
total number of clinician appointments in 2014, the first year in which
clinician visits declined substantially. Presenting the results, Alison Wringe
of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine said that rollout of
six-monthly appointments had been relatively slow, but enrolment was expected
to speed up with the introduction of routine viral load monitoring. (Wringe)
Streamlined clinic visits
The SEARCH study of community-based testing, expedited
linkage to care and treatment for all found that its model of streamlined
clinic care resulted in substantially shorter patient visits – on average,
around one hour less, and that both reduced waiting time and reduced clinical
consultation time explained this difference.
"Nobody likes to wait, and in these communities, patients
may wait up to four to five hours to see a clinician for five minutes," said
Starley B. Shade of University of San Francisco California, a member of the
SEARCH study team. Anticipation of such long waiting times may deter patients
from attending the clinic, especially if it involves a loss of income.
The SEARCH study used a streamlined care system in its
intervention communities in Uganda and Kenya in which nurses carried out triage of patients on
arrival at the clinic, directing patients through blood draws, clinician
appointments and pharmacy refill visits. The study included a time-and-motion
element in which patients were given a form to carry through their clinic visit
on which the start and finish times of each encounter with a service provider
were recorded. Researchers compared waiting times and entire clinic visit times
for intervention clinics (353 patients) and government clinics (745 patients)
providing standard of care services to the control arm in the study. They found
a mean visit length of 1.08 hours for those with CD4 counts above 500 and 1.13
hours for those with CD4 counts below 500 at intervention clinics, compared to
a mean of 2.35 hours at government clinics, of which over two hours was spent
waiting, with the longest waiting times for a clinical service and for a pharmacy
refill. A quarter of patients at government clinics spent more than 3.5 hours
at the clinic.
The streamlined care model freed clinical officers to see
patients in need of clinical attention, and also reduced the total number of
patient visits each day due to better planning of clinic appointments.
Community ART refills in Swaziland
Swaziland has extremely high HIV prevalence (31%) but many
people who need ART are still untreated. Expanding the capacity of the health
system to provide antiretroviral treatment in this largely rural country will
require a shift towards community-based health care. MSF implemented a pilot
programme in Swaziland to evaluate the success of moving clinically stable
patients on ART to community care models in 2015 and 2016. (Lukhele)
Patients in different types of facilities were given the
option of moving to various types of community care, all of which offered a
reduced amount of clinic attendance:
- Facility-based adherence clubs (three-monthly)
where around 30 patients attend to pick up pre-packaged medication. Blood draws
for viral load and clinical symptom reporting formed part of each session.
- Community ART groups of around six patients,
self-formed by patients, at rural facilities, in which members take turns to
collect medication and attend the clinic; group sessions the following day
involve medication pick-up, pill counts, adherence support and checking weight.
- Outreach service for very remote areas, where
pre-packaged medication is delivered monthly.
By the end of the second quarter of 2016, 727 patients had
been enrolled in community ART programmes, 40% in nine adherence clubs, 46% in
60 community ART groups and 14% in three outreach communities.
Patients in each group had median CD4 cell counts above 500
and had been on ART for more than five years. Visit attendance for each mode
was very high: 96% for adherence clubs and community outreach and 100% for
community ART groups. Forty-one patients returned to mainstream clinic care;
patients were significantly more likely to be retained in adherence clubs than
in community ART groups or in outreach care.
The main reasons for returning to mainstream care were a
lack of eligibility for community care in the first place, viral load test results
that required clinical attention, and communication issues within the community
ART group.
The MSF evaluation concluded that community management of
ART is feasible and that community health workers and lay people have important
roles to play in establishing and managing these services. Offering more than
one model through a facility is likely to improve uptake.
Further information