Changes to an individual’s risk profile – including starting
to have unprotected sex with a steady partner, a partner being diagnosed with
HIV and having a new diagnosis of syphilis – are associated with an increased
risk of HIV seroconversion in the following months, according to an analysis of
incidence in a cohort of Portuguese gay men, reported in Eurosurveillance last week.
These markers were more predictive than behavioural or
demographic factors noted when individuals entered the cohort. The results
suggest that when clinical or prevention services note such new events, more
intensive prevention services should be offered. They also underline how
quickly HIV infection can occur when HIV is highly prevalent and individuals
change their behaviours.
The Portuguese data are published alongside a French survey
which found that large numbers of respondents had no discernible prevention
strategy.
Portugal
The data come from men testing for HIV at CheckpointLX, a community testing
service in Lisbon. An open cohort was formed of men who tested negative at
their first visit, agreed to complete behavioural questionnaires and returned
for at least one more test. A total of 804 men who have sex with men met these
criteria between 2011 and 2014, providing data for a total of 893 person years.
Men in the cohort had an average age of 30, most
self-identified as homosexual, one-quarter were born outside Portugal and most
had previously tested for HIV. At baseline, 44% reported unprotected sex with
casual partners and 72% with a steady partner.
Each year, 2.8% of men acquired HIV. This is a little higher
than in some other studies of European gay men and may reflect the service’s
ability to reach men at higher risk of infection.
A number of factors were associated with acquiring HIV. The
researchers paid particular attention to changes in behaviours, for example not
reporting a behaviour at the first visit but subsequently reporting it. After
statistical adjustment, the following factors were associated with seroconversion
during follow-up:
- Newly reporting having unprotected sex with a
steady partner – odds ratio 3.8
- Consistently reporting unprotected sex with
casual partners – odds ratio 3.6
- Newly reporting having sex with an HIV-positive
partner – odds ratio 6.0
- Newly reporting that a sexual partner had been
diagnosed with HIV or had disclosed his HIV-positive status – odds ratio 5.2
- Reporting an HIV-positive steady partner – odds
ratio 3.3
- A new case of syphilis – odds ratio 4.7
Men who had an HIV-positive steady partner and started to have unprotected sex with
him were 17 times more likely to acquire HIV.
In contrast, behavioural factors noted when men entered the
cohort were not associated with
seroconversion. These factors included partner numbers, the venues used to meet
sexual partners, use of PEP and sexual role during anal sex. Demographic
factors such as age, education and sexual identity weren’t relevant either.
The authors conclude that short-term contextual and
behavioural changes fuel the high incidence seen in this urban cohort.
France
Over 10,000 gay men living in France were recruited on
dating websites, gay news websites, Facebook and a gay magazine to complete a
survey in 2011. Of these, 6665 answered all questions relevant to this analysis
and are included in the figures that follow.
Average age was 37, three-quarters were university educated,
half had a steady male partner, a quarter regularly used sex-on-premises venues
and one-in-seven had had a sexually transmitted infection in the previous year.
The researchers were interested in the ways in which
participants managed risk during anal intercourse. As well as consistent condom
use, this could involve seroadaptive behaviours such as serosorting (only having
unprotected sex with men of the same HIV status) and seropositioning (if having
unprotected sex with a partner of a different HIV status, the HIV-negative man always being ‘top’ and the HIV-positive man ‘bottom’). Men who had other
behaviours were described as having no discernible prevention practice.
Among those who had never tested for HIV, 50% reported
consistent condom use, 34% no discernible prevention practice and 16% no anal intercourse.
Among men who believed they were HIV negative, 55% reported
consistent condom use, 21% no discernible prevention practice, 16% exclusive
seroadaptive behaviours, and 8% no anal intercourse.
Turning to men with diagnosed HIV, the researchers separated
those likely to be infectious and those who were not.
Among men who had either a detectable viral load or a recent
sexually transmitted infection, 55% didn’t have any discernible prevention
practice, 30% reported exclusive seroadaptive behaviours, 13% consistent condom
use and 2% no anal intercourse.
Among men with well-controlled HIV, 45% were described as
not having any discernible prevention practice, 30% reported exclusive
seroadaptive behaviours, 22% consistent condom use and 3% no anal intercourse.
But it could be objected that men living with HIV who have an
undetectable viral load and no sexually transmitted infections are highly
unlikely to pass on HIV, so the ‘no discernible prevention practice’ label is
unhelpful. These men were, in effect, preventing HIV transmission through their
adherence to HIV treatment.
It’s also noticeable that those with well-controlled HIV
were more likely to consistently use condoms than men with uncontrolled
infection (a detectable viral load or a recent sexually transmitted infection).
The researchers analysed the characteristics of the men of
all HIV statuses who don’t appear to have a clear prevention strategy in place.
They were more likely to have had more than ten partners in the past year, to regularly use sex-on-premises venues and to regularly use dating
websites than other participants. Especially among HIV-negative men, they appear to be more
socially vulnerable than others – less educated, younger and living away from
the big cities.
Men living with HIV who were described as having no discernible strategy were more
likely to have been diagnosed after the year 2000 than earlier in the epidemic.
The authors say this points to a generational shift, with barebacking and ‘treatment
optimism’ having become more prevalent in recent years.