Men who have sex with men may now be at considerably higher
risk of acquiring HIV than other at-risk groups such as female sex workers or
young people of either sex, if findings by the International AIDS Vaccine
Initiative (IAVI) of HIV incidence at two centres in Kenya can be generalised to other
populations.
The study, which compared the Kenyan populations with a
largely heterosexual group from South
Africa, also found lower-than-expected HIV
incidence amongst female sex workers and their clients. The researchers also
found that recruiting men who have sex with men (MSM) into the study was easier than expected, but note
that there was a particularly high drop-out rate in MSM.
They comment that, while MSM “need urgent risk reduction
interventions, and may be a suitable cohort for future HIV prevention studies”,
because African MSM face considerable legal and social hurdles in coming forward,
“careful consideration of the counselling and clinical needs, follow-up
schedule and social support is vital to ensure continuing research
participation.”
The study
The aim of the study was to collect data on HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI)
incidence and risk factors in three populations in Kilifi, a district north of
Mombasa, and the Kangemi district of Nairobi, both in Kenya, and from Gugulethu
township in Cape Town in South Africa, the better to target HIV vaccine trials.
The
researchers recruited 716 people in Mombasa, 653 in Nairobi and 465 in Cape
Town. The researchers primarily used participants to recruit their peers in
South Africa, where background HIV prevalence (at 28%) is ten times higher than
in Kenya. In Kenya they recruited attendees at HIV testing centres, via outreach
work in bars and brothels, and via ‘snowball’ sampling (asking members of a
particular group to recruit others from the same group). The original idea had
been to collect data on high-risk heterosexuals including sex workers but, as the
researchers comment, “it quickly became apparent that MSM were willing to come
forward and participate in HIV prevention research”.
Somewhat
different monitoring and follow-up criteria were used in the three centres. In Cape Town, participants
were monitored monthly and followed up for one year, while in the two Kenyan
cohorts participants were monitored quarterly for two to four years. In Mombasa, participants were examined for STIs at every visit
but in Nairobi and Cape Town only examined if they had symptoms.
As a result, annual STI incidence was much higher in Mombasa (23%) than in the other two centres
(3.7 and 4.4%).
The average
age of participants was mid-20s (slightly older in Nairobi);
nearly 70% were women in Cape Town, 50% in Nairobi and 36% in Mombasa.
Participants in Cape
Town were almost entirely
heterosexual men and women and were not sex workers.
In Mombasa, 56% of men (36%
of the study population) were MSM; 63% of men said they had sold sex (mainly
to other men) and 54% had bought it. Three-quarters
of female participants said they were sex workers, while one-in-20 women
said they had bought sex.
In Nairobi, nearly all women
defined as a sex worker and 85% of the men had bought sex; 22.5% of the men had
had sex with other men and 33% defined as a male sex worker.
There was a
high drop-out rate in the study: 13% did not return after their enrolment visit;
37% altogether left the study prematurely. Annual attrition rates were 22% in Cape Town, 20% in Mombasa
and 10% in Nairobi.
The results
HIV incidence
was high in MSM in the Kenyan centres: annual incidence in MSM was 9.7% in Nairobi and 6.1% in Mombasa
(there were only three individuals who said they were MSM in Cape Town,
and none contracted HIV).
Annual HIV
incidence in women was 3% in Cape Town, 2.7% in female
sex workers and 2.3% in non-sex-workers in Mombasa,
and only 0.4% – much lower than expected – in Nairobi. Annual HIV incidence in non-MSM men
was 0.9% in Mombasa
and zero in the other two centres.
In a
multivariate analysis, predictors of HIV infection included:
- No secondary education versus some: hazard ratio
(HR): 3.34
- Genital ulcers,
yes versus no: HR 4.48
- Paid for sex versus not: HR 0.17
- Receptive-only anal sex versus no anal sex
(in men and women): HR 8.19
- Receptive and insertive anal sex versus none:
HR 3.55
- Insertive-only anal sex versus none: HR 0.88
(non-significant).
Thus, while
receptive anal sex was very strongly associated with HIV infection, insertive
anal sex was not. The finding that people who paid for sex were more than five
times less likely to acquire HIV than
people who did not was described as ‘unexpected’; the researchers suggest that
people having paid-for sex may be more wary of HIV and STIs and more likely to
use condoms.
The fact that
HIV incidence in female sex workers was far lower than expected, especially in Nairobi, is likely due to
decreasing background HIV prevalence and possibly more use of antiretrovirals. Higher
condom use is a less likely explanation, because annual pregnancy rates remained
high: the annual pregnancy rate was 18% in women in Nairobi,
14% in Cape Town and 11% in Mombasa.
This is some
of the first data on HIV incidence in MSM in Africa,
a continent where, as the researchers say, “The focus of prevention trials in
adult Africans has largely been on heterosexual transmission.” They add that a
recent UNAIDS report highlights the deficiencies in addressing the needs of MSM
and comment that it “reinforces the importance of closing this gap from both a
human rights and public health perspective”.