Expert panel maps global 'HIV prevention gap': $6 billion needed by 2007

This article is more than 21 years old.

A report released today with backing from UNAIDS and WHO spells out the gap between what could be done to control the global HIV epidemic and the resources available or promised to do so. The report, co-sponsored by two major US Foundations (Bill and Melinda Gates and the Kaiser Family Foundation) has been compiled by an international 40-member working group. It calls for global HIV prevention spending to be tripled from US $1.9 billion at present to $5.7 billion by 2005 and $6.6 billion by 2007. The bulk of this funding should come from wealthier countries as international development aid, which should be increased to 0.02 per cent of national income (GDP) for this purpose. At present, none of the donor countries meets this target. In addition, the report endorses the view that access to treatment and care needs to expand alongside HIV prevention.

The report quotes UNAIDS and WHO estimates that 29 million of the 45 million new HIV infections that are expected to happen between now and 2010 could be prevented, if well-tried current methods received the backing they need and deserve.

HIV prevention needs were assessed for developing countries, region by region, and compared to current levels of spending. Nearly half of what is being spent comes from the national resources of developing countries themselves. The extent of the gap varies around the world and is largest for Asia and the Pacific (US $1.48 billion), followed by Eastern Europe and Central Asia (US $1.18 billion), and then the Caribbean and Latin America (684 million). Current spending is highest in Sub-Saharan Africa, at $927 million, though even here spending needs to increase by more than 50%.

Glossary

UNAIDS

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) brings together the resources of ten United Nations organisations in response to HIV and AIDS.

harm reduction

Harm reduction is a set of practical strategies and ideas aimed at reducing negative consequences associated with drug use (including safer use, managed use and abstinence). It is also a movement for social justice built on a belief in, and respect for, the rights of people who use drugs.

infection control

Infection prevention and control (IPC) aims to prevent or stop the spread of infections in healthcare settings. Standard precautions include hand hygiene, using personal protective equipment, safe handling and disposal of sharp objects (relevant for HIV and other blood-borne viruses), safe handling and disposal of waste, and spillage management.

mother-to-child transmission (MTCT)

Transmission of HIV from a mother to her unborn child in the womb or during birth, or to infants via breast milk. Also known as vertical transmission.

sexually transmitted diseases (STDs)

Although HIV can be sexually transmitted, the term is most often used to refer to chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis, herpes, scabies, trichomonas vaginalis, etc.

The report endorses the promotion of sexual abstinence, but not to the exclusion of other approaches. "There is no magic bullet to prevent the spread of HIV. Only a combination of approaches that addresses the needs of different populations at risk can be effective," said Working Group co-chair David Serwadda of Makerere University, Uganda. "In Uganda, we have brought a severe HIV epidemic under control through the use of combination prevention, including abstinence education, condom promotion, voluntary HIV counselling and testing, and STD control. Other nations must be supported in their efforts to introduce a wide range of science-based prevention interventions, tailored to the needs of their people."

Other recommended interventions include promoting reductions in the number of partners, tackling gender inequity, ARV use to prevent mother to child transmission (especially in Africa), blood safety and infection control in health care, support for people living with HIV, behaviour-change programmes for men who have sex with men, and harm-reduction programmes for injecting drug users (especially in Asia and Eastern Europe).

The US Congress is considering a Bill to give reality to President Bush's pledge to commit US $15 billion over three years to global HIV and AIDS. As previously reported here, this includes provisions requiring that one third of the HIV prevention element - which is 20 per cent of the total - should be committed to promoting abstinence and/or monogamy. The proposed US spending on HIV prevention would add up to $3 billion over 5 years, or $600 million a year. Of this, $200 million would therefore have to be spent on promoting abstinence and/or monogamy. If US HIV prevention spending rose to $600 million a year, this would still be less than ten per cent of the global need estimated in this report, although it could meet a higher proportion of the needs in the particular countries in which it is to be concentrated.

References

Global HIV Prevention Working Group. Access to HIV Prevention: Closing the Gap, available online from the two US Foundations which co-sponsored it: the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation or the Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation.