Approximately one third of over 10,000 adolescents and young adults living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for more than six months attending HIV clinics throughout Kenya are not virally suppressed.
Dr Irene Njuguna of the Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya presented these findings from a national survey at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2020) this week.
Adolescents and young adults have the highest rates of dropping out of HIV treatment and care putting them at high risk of virologic failure, disease and death. While innovative approaches have been developed in HIV clinics to address the unique challenges adolescents and young people face, it is unclear whether these affect viral suppression.
Njuguna and her colleagues believe that achieving the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals needs an understanding of both individual and clinic correlates of viral suppression.
Using viral load data and facility surveys from HIV treatment programmes throughout Kenya they undertook a multi-level cross-sectional analysis, with 99 HIV clinics randomly selected from a national pool of 300. From the medical records of adolescents and young adults in HIV care they analysed a subset of those on ART for more than six months between January 2016 and December 2017. Information on adolescent and young adults services was collected from each clinic.
Use of multi-level regression models determined individual- and clinic-level correlates of viral suppression (under 1000).
Only 73% of participants were virally suppressed.
After adjusting for individual-level factors, the 14% of clinics with viral suppression rates of at least 80% were more likely to have designated adolescent spaces (adjusted odds ratio aOR: 1.27 (95% CI: 1.03-1.56)) viral load testing turnaround time of under 10 days (aOR: 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03-1.09)) and be a mission or foundation hospital (aOR: 2.09 (95% CI: 1.35-3.24)).
While adjusting for clinic-level factors, those aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years were less likely to be suppressed compared to those aged 20-24 years (aOR: 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55-0.71) and aOR: 0.60 (95% CI: 0.53-0.69)), respectively.
Males were less likely to be suppressed than females (aOR: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63-0.78)).
Njuguna concluded that a dedicated adolescent space, rapid turnaround of viral load results and tailored approaches for specific groups may improve viral suppression. Additionally mission and foundation hospitals may offer lessons in care strategies.