Health promotion interventions can combine information about
condoms and alternative biomedical prevention methods without undermining
attitudes and intentions to use condoms, according to an experimental study
published in the September issue of AIDS
& Behavior.
“Our results are inconsistent with risk compensation theory,
which posits that use of a biomedical prevention approach will lead to less
positive attitudes, intentions, and use of condoms,” comment the authors.
Typically, health education messages encourage individuals
to take a single course of action, without considering alternative options. However
a ‘combination prevention’ approach may involve advocacy of more than one
possible course of action. There has been little previous research on how
receiving multiple prevention messages affects attitudes and intentions to use
condoms. Condoms remain a particularly cheap and effective way of preventing
HIV transmission in those who are happy to use them.
The researchers therefore conducted an experiment in which
HIV-negative gay men would watch information videos about different prevention
topics. Four HIV-prevention videos were developed, each one focusing solely on
either condoms, PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis), PEP (post-exposure prophylaxis) or rectal microbicides. Each video had a similar
style, delivering a similar range of factual information about the method’s
financial cost, effectiveness at preventing infection, mode of operation, side-effects and impact on sexual pleasure.
Study participants were randomised to see either a single
video, a combination of two videos, or all four videos together.
Afterwards, the researchers asked men about their likelihood
of using the prevention method(s) they had just been given information about.
In addition, the respondents were asked about the advantages and disadvantages
of sex with and without condoms.
A sample of 803 HIV-negative gay men was recruited through targeted
Facebook advertising in the United States. Of note, men in this sample reported
relatively high rates of condom use – four in five said they had always used
condoms with casual partners in the past year.
The researchers wanted to check that hearing about
alternative prevention options wouldn’t make people feel less favourably
towards condoms. The results were very reassuring – there were no significant
differences in participants’ intention of using condoms, or their assessment of
condoms’ costs and benefits, according to the videos that had been seen.
This was also the case for intentions to use PEP, PrEP or
rectal microbicides. Seeing information about additional options either made no
difference to men’s intention to use a specific method (e.g. a microbicide), or
it was associated with a greater intention to use them (PEP, PrEP).
The results were consistent for men who reported unprotected
sex with casual partners, and men who did not.
“In summary, our
results suggest no differences in attitudes and intentions towards condom use
or unprotected sex when MSM [men who have sex with men] received brief messages about condoms and multiple
biomedical prevention approaches,” the researchers conclude. The results should
encourage those who plan to disseminate information about biomedical prevention
options, they comment.