A pilot rollout in England of a new, standardised intensive HIV
prevention package for gay men at high risk of HIV infection would include a
substudy in which half of them will be offered pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP),
the 17th British HIV Association (BHIVA) Conference heard in Bournemouth last week.
The proposal, which has
been drafted by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) and members of BHIVA, is at
an early stage and would need to secure funding from a variety of sources,
including local authorities who will now be in charge of public health, to be
viable.
The “Intensified
Combination Prevention” (ICP) is a package which will involve:
- regular, rather
than ad-hoc, attendance at GUM clinics by the target population
- a standardised
counselling intervention at each attendance based on motivational interviewing
- and, at 50% of the ten GUM clinics involved, daily oral PrEP using open-label tenofovir/FTC
(Truvada).
The pilot phase would last
two years.
Background: increasing diagnoses in gay men
Professor Noel Gill, chief
epidemiologist of the HPA, spoke of a sense of new urgency in the need to bring
down the number of HIV infections diagnosed in gay men and men who have sex
with men (MSM) in the UK.
Last year the number of MSM diagnosed with HIV exceeded 3,000 for the first time
ever. This represented an 11%
jump in the number of new diagnoses in one year, after a couple of years
in
which infections stayed relatively static, and for the second year running they represented the risk group with the
highest number of diagnoses, after a decade in which there were more new
diagnoses amongst Africans living in the UK than gay men.
The annual number of new diagnoses
in gay men has increased by 41% since 2001. Gay men represent
nearly half of all those infected in the UK.
Infections among
heterosexuals within the UK
also continues to increase and has tripled since 2001; last year's annual total
of 1150 represents one-sixth of new diagnoses.
Professor Gill said he had
initially hoped that the continuing increase of diagnoses in gay men was due to
more coming forward for tests. He had also anticipated that lack of increase in
diagnoses seen in 2008 and 2009 might signal that antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive people was starting to have an effect by bringing down their
infectiousness, as has been observed elsewhere. This year’s increase, however,
sent a warning signal that so far this did not seem to be the case in
the UK.
“I’ve spent eight years
expecting diagnoses to go down,” he said, “and it’s clear that we need to do something
new”. He estimated that 3,000 new diagnoses represented an additional cost to
the NHS of £38 million a year.
Intensified combination prevention
Gill said that the UK’s
network of open-access, STI-specific GUM clinics represented a unique
environment in which to test both Intensified Combination Prevention (ICP) and
PrEP.
There are 204 GUM clinics
in England
of which 29 – most of them larger clinics representing nearly half of all
patients - are involved in an existing surveillance and research collaboration
with the HPA called GUMNET. The cost of involving all 29 clinics in the pilot ICP-and-PrEP
intervention would be well in excess of £50 million so the proposal is
that ten clinics pilot ICP and that five of them include PrEP as part of the
package.
The sole criterion for
offering ICP and PrEP is that the patient be a ‘high risk gay man. ‘High risk’
is defined as
- attending with
an acute sexually transmitted infection (STI) and/or
- having had unprotected
anal sex with a regular partner of positive or unknown status in the last six
months and/or
- having had unprotected
anal sex with at least one casual partner in the last six months.
Gill said that to roll out
this prevention initiative, even in ten clinics, would involve an unprecedented
collaboration and pooling of funds between STI and HIV clinicians, the at-risk
communities, the new commissioners of public health, medical research groups,
and the pharmaceutical industry.
He hoped that pharmaceutical companies would appreciate that this
proposal potentially had international implications when it came to
demonstrating
the feasibility of rolling out PrEP in the real world.
Dr Tony Nardone, the HPA’s
specialist in virology, put some more figures on the proposal. The idea is to
recall all ‘high risk’ gay men as defined above for routine appointments three
and six months after first attendance and then every six months. Men offered
PrEP would also attend at months one and nine, requiring two more attendances
per year. This is because men taking PrEP would be tested for HIV every three instead
of every six months, due to the need to avoid taking PrEP while seroconverting
for HIV, and also to discuss any adherence difficulties at an early stage.
As well as the basic
testing, counselling and PrEP package, ICP would also offer net-based health
promotion and behavioural monitoring and accelerated partner notification.
Nardone said that about
9000 MSM turn up with an acute STI at the GUMNET clinics every year and that if
the larger clinics are involved 3600 to 6000 MSM could be enrolled in the
two-year pilot of ICP, of which half would be offered PrEP. Annual HIV
incidence amongst repeat visitors to GUMNET clinics – excluding those diagnosed
with HIV on their first visit - was 1.1%. This should be enough to be able to
prove establish efficacy for PrEP if the reduction in infections was the same
as in the iPrEx study (43%).
The BHIVA/BASHH position statement
BHIVA and the British
Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH), which represents GUM clinicians,
are collaborating on writing a Position Statement on PrEP including:
- a review of
the PrEP data so far
- appraisal of which populations might benefit from it
- a review
of cost-effectiveness models
- the identification of research gaps.
This will be available for community consultation and comment this summer, with the
aim of publication at the autumn BHIVA conference in October.
BHIVA’s Sheena McCormack,
who is co-ordinating the Position Statement, emphasised that this project would
cover all possible populations who might benefit from PrEP and was not restricted
to the gay community.
Audience members in the
meeting announcing the ICP/PrEP proposal had several comments and queries. Some
questioned that ‘treatment as prevention’ was failing to work in the UK. Others
emphasised that as much thought and effort needed to be involved in the counselling
intervention as PrEP and that psychologists and social researchers must be involved.
Finally, the PrEP proposal as it stands is dependent on Truvada being available at no or reduced cost and it was questioned
if this would be forthcoming.
NAM is the
community partner in the BHIVA/BASHH Position Statement project. To find out
more, email info@nam.org.uk with the
subject line ‘PrEP’.