The first head-to-head trial directly comparing the
acceptability of tenofovir pills and tenofovir microbicide gel amongst HIV-negative
women has found that, while African women liked both products equally,
three-quarters of US women preferred a pill.
The study also found, not unexpectedly, that concentrations
of tenofovir in cells in the cervix and vagina were, respectively, 20 and 100
times higher in women using the gel than taking the pill. Although there is no
definitive evidence yet, this suggests that a topical microbicide might be more
fully protective against sexual infection than oral PrEP.
Conversely, concentrations of tenofovir in cells in the
blood were 54 times higher in women taking oral PrEP than in those using a
gel. The level reached in blood and blood cells in women using the
microbicide gel was less than one-tenth of the minimum observed concentration
of tenofovir required to inhibit HIV replication by 50% (the IC50),
and much lower than the average IC50, indicating that levels of drug
in the blood of microbicide users who become infected with HIV despite
microbicide use are unlikely to generate resistance – though this is also yet
to be shown.
In the MTN-001 study, 144 women at seven sites in Africa and
the US were randomised to take a daily tenofovir pill, use daily 1% tenofovir
microbicide gel, or use both together. All women used all three regimens at
some point during the study: women were randomised to use one regimen for six
weeks, take a week’s break, then use another, and so on, until they had used all
three.
Self-reported adherence was 94% and did not differ between
regimens but, as has been found in other prevention trials, actual adherence as
measured by drug concentrations was in the range of 35 to 65%. There was a
higher rate of nausea in women taking oral tenofovir (15% with solo tenofovir,
14% with both formulations) than in women using the gel alone (3%).
There was a rough symmetry in concentrations in genitals and
blood according to whether women were taking the gel or the pill.
For instance,
the concentration of tenofovir in the blood of women taking the pill was 332
nanograms per millilitre (ng/ml) but in the vagina only 0.2 ng/ml; conversely
the concentration in the blood of women using the gel was 3.7 ng/ml but in
vaginal tissues, 113 ng/ml. Tenofovir’s IC50 (the concentration of
drug needed to inhibit half the virus) is 220 to 500 ng/ml (Skowron and Ogden),
but the drug, when administered as a microbicide, reached much higher
concentrations in cells, which is where it needs to do its work. However,
presenter Craig Hendrix did warn that “what is ‘enough’ for prevention is yet
to be defined”.
Ninety-three per cent of women said they would use the
tablet if they needed to in the future, 83% the gel and 82% both
formulations. This difference was driven entirely by women
in the four US sites.
Seventy-three per cent of US women said they preferred to
take an oral tenofovir pill, whereas African women preferred pill and gel about
equally, with 42 to 44% each saying their first preference was the pill or the
gel. African women's preference for gel was driven by a number of African participants who said they preferred the gel because it made sex better.
Abstracts and webcast
You can view the abstract from this research on the official conference
website:
Abstract 35LB: http://www.retroconference.org/2011/Abstracts/42418.htm
You can also watch a webcast of the presentations made at this conference
session.
Webcast from HIV Prevention: HSV2, Topical and Oral PrEP, and Circumcision.
We rely on donations
to continue our work to help people with HIV, support us today at: www.aidsmap.com/donate