The 19th
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) heard this week that
a tenfold increase in medical male circumcision (MMC) in non-Muslim men in the
Rakai district of Uganda has led to a 28% fall in HIV incidence since MMC was
made widely available. Incidence in Muslim men, who are all circumcised and had
a lower incidence rate in the first place, did not fall during the same period,
so this fall appears to be a consequence of circumcision. No comparable fall
(or rise) in HIV incidence has been seen in women so far, however, and only a
third of non-Muslim men have so far become circumcised.
Another study from Orange Farm district in
South Africa has found that since the roll-out of MMC in the area, the
prevalence of herpes (HSV-2) is 23% lower in men who have become circumcised
than ones who have not, though this is not as big a reduction as the 55%
reduction in HIV prevalence seen.
Three
randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of medical male circumcision as an HIV prevention
measure took place in the mid-2000s and produced a reduction in HIV infections
in circumcised, compared to uncircumcised, men ranging from 51% to 60%. Since
2007, programmes offering MMC to men in the areas where the RCTs happened have
produced large increases in the proportion of men who are circumcised.
Rakai
Ronald
Gray, principal investigator in the Raki RCT, told the conference that MMC was
made available in the district from 2007 onwards. The prevalence of MMC
and the annual incidence of HIV infections were estimated among all non-Muslim
men over a four-year period before the availability of MMC (2000 to 2003) and 5
years after its availability (2006 to 2011). HIV incidence was also estimated
over the same periods in Muslim men circumcised in childhood.
MMC was
provided as a free, accessible service from 2007 onwards. Population surveys
show that the proportion of non-Muslim men who were circumcised increased from
3.3% in 2000 to 25% in 2009 and 35% in 2011. Medical male circumcision prevalence
among non-Muslim men increased from 3.3% in 2000 to 2003 to 25.3% in 2009 and
35% in 2011. Most men were getting circumcised in their early twenties, but the
proportion of under-19s who were circumcised increased from 3.8% to 12.4%
during the same period.
Among all
non-Muslim men (circumcised and uncircumcised), HIV incidence declined from
1.4% a year in 2000-2003 to 1.0% a year in 2004-2009, a 22% fall after
adjusting for population changes. This was significant (95% confidence interval
2% to 38%, p = 0.04). In Muslim men HIV incidence stayed the same, at
0.57% a year in 2000-03 and 0.46% a year in 2004-09 (p = 0.58). Annual HIV
incidence in non-Muslim men is half as high in circumcised men compared to
uncircumcised ones (1.1% versus 0.55%).
The researchers
estimated that the ‘population attributable fraction’ in the fall in HIV
incidence in non-Muslim men was 37%, meaning that there would be 37% more HIV
infections in all non-Muslim men if the proportion circumcised had not
increased.
There
were no changes in risk behaviours among non-Muslims after the availability of
medical male circumcision. The proportion of men who had had a non-marital sexual
partner was 46% in 2002-03 and 42% in 2006-11 (18% and 14% respectively had two
or more non-marital partners).
So far,
however, there has been no significant decline in HIV incidence in non-Muslim
women, though there has been a trend: incidence was 1.4% a year in 2000-03 and
1.2% in 2006-11, an 11% decline (95% confidence interval -29% to +5%, p
= 0.15).
Gray commented that despite considerable publicity only a third of
non-Muslim men were as yet circumcised, and said that there was an “urgent need
for demand creation to increase the acceptance of medical male circumcision.”
Orange Farm
Circumcision
also became generally available for free in 2007 in Orange Farm; this RCT announced its results in mid-2005 but roll-out
was not started till the results from the other RCTs came through.
A presentation at last year’s IAS conference in
Rome showed that the proportion of men in the community had trebled from 16% to
49% since the roll-out and that HIV prevalence in circumcised men was 55%
lower.
Two
cross-sectional surveys were conducted, one in 2007, before the beginning of
the roll-out, and one in 2010-11. In the 2011 survey of 3355 men randomly
picked from the community, the mean age was 26. About 30% were married and 40%
had children; They had had an average of 2.5 partners in the last year and 44%
maintained consistent condom use. Circumcision prevalence was now 53%, and 59%
in 20-24 year olds.
Compared
to uncircumcised men, circumcised men were younger; more educated; more
likely to be unemployed; to be of Sotho ethnicity; and to know their HIV
status. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of
religion or reported sexual behavior, including condom use, and alcohol
consumption.
In men
aged 15 to 49, HSV-2 prevalence was 31% in uncircumcised men and 16.5% in
circumcised men. After adjusting for population characteristics, this equated
to a 23% reduction in HSV-2 prevalence in circumcised men.
Principal
investigator Bertran Auvert said that if male circumcision did not exist in the
community, HSV-2 prevalence would have been 15.5% higher among all men aged 15
to 49, and 26% higher in men aged 15 to 34. “This study shows that circumcision
can have a significant impact on HSV-2 infections in men in quite a short time,”
he commented.
He said there were signs that awareness of the protective effect of
circumcision was spreading among the community: “Our age profiles show that at
first the young guys were getting circumcised, but now we see older guys
getting interested in it,” he said.