People receiving dolutegravir-based antiretroviral treatment
in Brazil’s national treatment programme were far more likely to have a fully
suppressed viral load six months after starting treatment, according to a
review of all patients who started treatment between 2014 and 2017 presented on
Tuesday at the 22nd International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2018) in Amsterdam.
The findings lend further support to the World Health
Organization’s recommendation that dolutegravir-based treatment should be the
preferred first-line regimen for adults and adolescents starting antiretroviral
treatment
Brazil’s national treatment programme was one of the first
in a middle-income setting to adopt dolutegravir-based treatment as the
preferred option for first-line therapy, in early 2017. Dolutegravir is an
integrase inhibitor with a high barrier to resistance. The drug is well
tolerated in the vast majority of people.
As a consequence of a deal between the Medicines Patent Pool
and ViiV Healthcare, dolutegravir is available in 92 lower-income countries as
part of a three-drug combination for approximately $75 a year. Brazil’s
government agreed a price of approximately $500 a year with ViiV Healthcare in
October 2016 and negotiated a further discount in 2018.
To assess the efficacy of dolutegravir relative to other
drugs used in first-line treatment in its national programme, Brazil’s Ministry
of Health carried out an analysis of viral suppression six months after
starting treatment in 103,240 people who began treatment between January 2014
and July 2017.
The study population was aged 15 years and over, just over
two-thirds (67%) were male and approximately one in five (21.7%) had a baseline
viral load above 100,000 copies/ml. The median baseline viral load was 38,057
copies/ml and the median baseline CD4 cell count was 394 cells/mm3.
Seventy-four per cent started treatment with a regimen of
tenofovir, lamivudine and efavirenz, 7% with tenofovir, lamivudine and
dolutegravir, 4.9% with zidovudine, lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir and 4.6%
with tenofovir, lamivudine and atazanavir/ritonavir.
Viral suppression rates six months after starting treatment
ranged from 63.7% in those who started treatment on the regimen of tenofovir,
lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir (2% of the cohort) to 85.2% in those who
started treatment with tenofovir, lamivudine and dolutegravir (7.2%).
A multivariate analysis which controlled for demographic
factors, baseline CD4 count and viral load showed that, when compared to people
who started treatment with dolutegravir, people who received dolutegravir with
tenofovir and lamivudine were 42% more likely to have an undetectable viral
load (< 50 copies/ml) six months after starting treatment than people
receiving efavirenz with tenofovir and lamivudine (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.32-1.52).
Those who started treatment with protease inhibitor-based
regimens – either lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir – were around 40%
less likely to achieve an undetectable viral load than people receiving
tenofovir, lamivudine and efavirenz, six months after starting treatment.