AIDS is no longer an emergency to be met with a “make-it-up-as-you-go”
response, ex-US President Bill Clinton told the Eighteenth International AIDS
Conference in Vienna today.
It needs sustainable funding that is secure from economic
downturns, but also needs to achieve efficiencies of scale and delivery if we
are to continue gains we have made this decade.
Clinton gave an upbeat assessment of the current state of
prevention and access to care, echoing Churchill in saying “We are not at the
beginning of the end of the AIDS epidemic, but we are at the end of the
beginning.”
The annual global AIDS budget had risen since 2002 from $6
billion to $16 billion a year; there were now 5.2 million people on antiretroviral
treatment; global HIV prevalence had fallen by 17% in the last decade; and the
proportion of people with HIV in low- and middle-income countries who knew their
HIV status more than doubled from 15% in 2005-6 to 39% in 2007-8.
He said he was “thrilled” about developments in South
Africa, where HIV incidence in young women aged 16 to 24 had declined by 60%
– see this report.
However, he also pointed out that still only a third of the people
who needed treatment were receiving it and that the main challenge the world’s people
with HIV faced was ensuring that the momentum towards comprehensive treatment
and prevention was maintained through the current financially difficult times.
“We knew the economic crisis would challenge our ability to
keep the AIDS movement going,” he said.
The primary subject of Clinton’s speech was how to achieve
greater financial efficiency and economy of scale in a situation in which
global AIDS funding was likely to be held static for the next couple of years.
Clinton said government funding was unlikely to increase in
the near future, and defended his successor Barack Obama who has been accused
of breaking promises by flatlining AIDS funding. He praised initiatives like
UNITAID, the treatment-funding initiative partly financed by an air-travel
levy, and its new offshoot MassiveGood in which individuals can make voluntary
donations when booking travel.
“The best way to raise private money once you get past Bill
Gates is to raise a massive amount of money in small amounts, by user-friendly
means,” Clinton said.
Private individuals were willing to fund HIV if it did not
take too much effort to do so: a non-HIV related example had been the US
response to the recent Haiti earthquake, in which people could simply donate by
texting HAITI to a number which would add the cost of their text to the
earthquake appeal.
Clinton praised UNITAID, which funds Clinton’s own Health
Access Initiative (CHAI), for successfully bringing down the cost of second-line
therapies for low-income countries from $1000 a year to $435. However, he said
he saw little immediate chance of further reductions in the cost of first-line
therapy from the current $90, except in improved pricing for tenofovir-containing
fixed-dose combinations.
We knew the economic crisis would challenge our ability to
keep the AIDS movement going, Bill Clinton, former US President
Any further reduction in the cost of treatment to low-income
countries would therefore have to come from more efficiency and lower
distribution costs. He praised ‘task shifting’ programmes, in which nurses were
trained to do tasks formerly performed by doctors and community health workers
the tasks of nurses. He commended South Africa’s community health worker
programme and was applauded when he said that South African President Jacob
Zuma “is proud that his country is no longer a pariah in the fight against AIDS
– and I’m proud they saved $300 million”.
Small and local should be beautiful in the future, he added.
“We need to work with local organisations that can deal with things much more
cheaply with fewer overheads. At present in HIV there are too many meetings,
too many progress reports and studies that sit on shelves.”
He added, however, that health economists had never really
factored in the true savings due to keeping an economically active person alive
for 40 more years instead of five. He pointed out that, in the USA, people
building a nuclear power station could pay the cost by instalments over the
forthcoming 30 years because it was recognised that power stations more than
recouped their costs over that period.
“Healthcare is not just a right,” he said, “It is an
extraordinarily high-value development investment with a high rate of return.” He
criticised the US pharmaceutical industry for not reducing its prices so that
1700 people with HIV in the USA could be taken off waiting lists for
antiretrovirals.
“The drug manufacturers have been paid $10,000 a year per patient
by the government for years for Medicaid programmes,” he said. “They could take
care of those 1700 people tomorrow and never miss the money.”
Clinton was critical of the "false dichotomies" that had
created tension in the last few years, in which some global health advocates had
claimed that progress towards other UN Millennium Development Goals such as
maternal and child health had been harmed by HIV claiming by far the largest
slice of global health funding.
“This rivalry is a movie we’ve seen before,” he said, drawing
parallels with arguments in the late 1990s that the cost of treatment would
drain the money from prevention programmes, and to the perennial claim that harm
reduction programmes damage the fight against illegal drugs.
“It’s no coincidence that child mortality has gone down 35%
and maternal mortality 20% in the decade of The Global Fund,” he said, and drew
applause when he added that “now we know that the more harm reduction we
offer, the more drug use does down.”
He reserved his harshest words for politicians who are
reluctant to target prevention and care to marginalised groups: “There are still
places where the main source of the HIV epidemic is MSM and the politicians
still deny they exist. There are still paces where IDUs are not dealt with
beyond the first bump in the road.”
Clinton finished by running through six priorities global
AIDS funding needed to achieve if the
momentum towards global treatment and prevention was to be continued. These were
to avoid false choices between different disease areas; to strive for lower drug
costs; to target prevention efficiently; to enact “disciplined, honest, no-backside-covering ways to save the costs of drug delivery;” to create better
private donation and investment structures; and “to educate people why this is
good.”
“Our only chance,” he concluded, “is that the
positive forces fighting HIV are just that little bit bigger than the negative
ones.”
Watch Bill Clinton's speech on the Kaiser Family Foundation website.