Introduction

Edwin J. Bernard
Published: 18 July 2010

Twitter

  • DeBalie is filling fast so register now for Beyond Blame 2018: Challenging HIV Criminalisation, Amsterdam, Monday 2… https://t.co/FTA2WzVjt0 24 May 2018
  • RT @KELINKenya: .@AIDS_Free_World’s Legal Consultation Centers provide delegates and the public with free with attorneys on #HIV & law. Are… 23 May 2018
  • We're almost half-full already, so if you want to share your experiences, or learn more about, ending HIV criminali… https://t.co/skvEu5Z3yY 23 May 2018
  • RT @HIVJusticeNet: Register now for #BeyondBlame2018: Challenging #HIVCriminalisation De Balie, Amsterdam, 23 July 2018 #HIVJusticeWorldwid17 May 2018
  • RT @Beyond_Positive: NEW BLOG: 'Changing my mind on HIV by criminalisation' by @PatchworkSteve “If you had a dog, and that dog had rabies… 10 May 2018
  • Register now for #BeyondBlame2018: Challenging #HIVCriminalisation De Balie, Amsterdam, 23 July 2018… https://t.co/9xAvewQRBV 09 May 2018
  • Register now for #BeyondBlame2018: Challenging #HIVCriminalisation, De Balie, Amsterdam, 23 July 2018… https://t.co/90XJUNnqFj 09 May 2018
  • Mexico: Supreme Court finds Veracruz law criminalising ‘wilful transmission’ of HIV and STIs to be unconstitutional… https://t.co/GhT3Fbun0y 01 May 2018
  • RT @Bojorquez: The Mexican Supreme Cort rules unconstitutional to criminalize people living with HIV/AIDS and other STI's in the state of V… 01 May 2018
  • RT @EbaPatrick: Les ONG francophones se réunissent pour étudier les stratégies contre la pénalisation du VIH #AFRAVIH2018 @MalecheAllan @HI27 Apr 2018
  • RT @MalecheAllan: In 2014 we worked with @commonwealthorg to analyze our HIV laws in Kenya & identified the punitive ones https://t.co/70Gq… 27 Apr 2018
  • RT @UNDP: 6 years ago, @HIVLawCom showed the 🌎 how bad laws & policies are holding back progress on HIV. It’s time to revisit the discussio… 27 Apr 2018
  • RT @Synergiaihr: Edwin J. Bernard, @HIVJusticeNet : criminalization of HIV is ineffective & targets vulnerable communities. “Kerry is HIV p… 27 Apr 2018
  • RT @AAI_AIDSwatch: @HIVJusticeNet Edwin Bernard speaks to the need to educate lawmakers who think they are doing good by introducing #hiv t… 27 Apr 2018
  • RT @napwha: We've two ideas for the cover of the upcoming issue of Positive Living. Which one we run is up to you: white or black..? https:… 11 Apr 2018
  • RT @kenpinkela: The Eloquent and Inspiring Justice Edwin Cameron - #Stigma and the Role of Courts: The Disquieting Case of #AIDS https://t.… 10 Apr 2018
  • RT @iasociety: 68 countries and 98 jurisdictions have specific #HIV criminalization laws in place. IAS Member and @HIVJusticeNet Global Coo… 10 Apr 2018
  • Thanks to Cecile Kazatchkine from @AIDSLAW for leading on HIV JUSTICE WORLDWIDE's support of an emerging Francophon… https://t.co/Q18WDqaWTC 10 Apr 2018
  • Thanks @nicheholas. As you know, the indefatiguable @o_g_ford pulled all this together for @uspwn on behalf of HIV… https://t.co/fX6ZdLBW5w 10 Apr 2018
  • RT @AIDSLAW: Webinar: Making Media Work for HIV Justice - April 5 11 a.m. ET. Explore material from the HIV Justice toolkit, and hear from… 04 Apr 2018

How this resource addresses the criminalisation of HIV exposure and transmission

HIV, the virus that can lead to AIDS, has from its earliest days been associated with controversy.

Why has HIV generated so much more social, political and ethical debate than other potentially life-threatening illnesses?

  • In large part, the sheer scale of the epidemic: every region of the world is affected, and over 33 million people are living with the condition; more than 2 million have died of HIV-related causes.
  • In addition, although effective treatment is now available for many, the virus has proved a major scientific and medical challenge to understand, to disable and to eliminate.
  • Coupled with this, some of the behaviours that transmit HIV are associated with strong social taboos, and some of the populations most affected by the disease (women; men who have sex with men; people who use drugs; sex workers; migrants; and those living in poverty, for example) are already disproportionately marginalised in society.

These factors have shaped the global response to HIV in complex ways, with major debates and decisions being as much about beliefs and values as about scientific evidence. People often have strong feelings about many HIV-related issues. The most constructive way to engage in the challenges posed by the epidemic is not to ignore this reality, but rather to situate it within a larger framework that examines how emotions inform opinions and how factual information and logical reasoning should inform opinions as well.

The purpose of this resource is to put forth such a framework in relation to HIV and the criminal law. The resource examines the key legal, scientific, ethical and social issues raised by the application of criminal law to HIV exposure and transmission. It is intended to serve as a 'primer' and 'filler' for people needing to understand these issues, as well as providing information on the current situation across the globe. It may be particularly useful for:

  • people living with HIV and their advocates
  • policymakers and lawmakers
  • lawyers, judges, jury members and others involved in criminal prosecutions
  • law enforcement officers
  • journalists
  • health and social workers advising people with HIV in health care and other settings.

This book does not seek to bring readers around to a specific outlook on the criminalisation of HIV exposure or transmission. The intricacies of how people develop and act on their beliefs make it unlikely that there will ever be widespread agreement on some of the issues in this realm. Instead, it provides a guide to thinking systematically about the facts and concepts most relevant to HIV-criminalisation laws, cases and debates.

The essential questions in most cases in which criminal charges are brought for alleged HIV exposure or transmission are:

  • Was the defendant responsible for causing a significant or unreasonable risk of harm to the alleged victim(s)?
  • What evidence exists to support or refute the charges?

In the context of HIV, these seemingly straightforward questions encompass numerous other questions that may engender fierce debate. For example:

  • Is it appropriate to legislate against HIV exposure and transmission, and – if so – what sort of laws should these be? What are the risks of legislating for this behaviour and/or of using existing, non-HIV specific laws to prosecute for HIV exposure or transmission?
  • What harm does exposure to HIV or HIV infection cause relative to other forms of harm?
  • Who should take responsibility for preventing HIV transmission/infection? Do HIV-positive people have more of an HIV-prevention duty than HIV-negative people?
  • What constitutes a significant or unreasonable risk of HIV exposure or transmission?
  • How does biological, epidemiological and behavioural evidence support or refute the arguments that are put forth about HIV-related responsibility, risk and harm?
  • What impact do such prosecutions have – on individuals, on their relationships with others (both professional and personal), on public health, and on communities at a wider level?

This resource delves into these and related issues in chapters on laws, harm, responsibility, risk and proof.

In addition, an introductory chapter provides an overview of the issues involved in this topic. It includes an overview of HIV, AIDS, modes of transmission and the legal concepts that have shaped thinking and action in this arena for over two decades. The chapters Impact and Fundamentals discuss, respectively, the impact of criminalising HIV transmission and/or exposure, and alternative legal and policy tools for accomplishing HIV-prevention goals.

And finally, the chapter Details, which provides a summary of the history and current legal situation (accurate at 1 June, 2010) in countries that have chosen to criminalise any element of HIV exposure or transmission, illustrates the global implications of such laws and policies.

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.