Introduction

Twitter

  • RT @LaurelDSprague: This is the anti-criminalization message and truth that we need to get across to governments. #Decrim4Health https://t.… 25 Apr 2017
  • Amazing photo, incredible meeting. Thanks @_ARASAcomms + @LaurelDSprague and everyone who attended. Let's make this… https://t.co/fypH8qOytZ 25 Apr 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: Day 2 of the Revolutionising HIV Criminalisation hosted by ARASA & @HIVJusticeNet continues Johannesburg today. Follow #De25 Apr 2017
  • Together we can make HIV Justice WORDLWIDE a reality! https://t.co/T8KGsa64Pq 25 Apr 2017
  • Some good, some worrying reasoning on why the law doesn't have HIV criminalisation in it. Disclosure obligation rec… https://t.co/y0Qhp2rYae 24 Apr 2017
  • RT @Follow_SALC: Thomas: looking forward to a day when HIV care and prevention is understood without use of criminal law #Decrim4Health htt… 24 Apr 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: We are so honoured to be able to hear from HIV criminalisation survivor Kerry Thomas from prison via Skype. #Decrim4Health 24 Apr 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: Our Keynote Speaker, Dr Ruth Labode, Zimbabwe MP, spoke with such passion about the harms of HIV criminalisation #Decrim4H24 Apr 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: Panel share their experiences around HIV criminalisation through case law to highlight the common patterns. #Decrim4Health24 Apr 2017
  • Excellent intersectional analysis by @uspwn, one of our HIV JUSTICE WORLDWIDE partners #hivisnotacrime https://t.co/A1T4qfHqaV 24 Apr 2017
  • Despite Nigeria Senate approving overly broad HIV criminalisation statutes in 2015, those laws were never enacted.… https://t.co/2L01wOiGYV 24 Apr 2017
  • RT @lynmab: @_ARASAcomms Advocacy approaches need to address high levels of social Criminalisation. We must oppose all forms of Criminalisa… 24 Apr 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: Johanna Kehler: We need agency, not protection! Lack of agency becomes the cause and effect of HIV criminalisation #Decrim24 Apr 2017
  • Educating policymakers and parliamentarians about why HIV criminalisation does more harm than good to public health… https://t.co/QdFxQbc3MX 24 Apr 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: You can read more about the state of HIV criminalisaion globally in Advancing HIV Justice 2 https://t.co/khUeZd72NS #Decri24 Apr 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: Dr @laurelsprague,@HIVJusticeNet:The left map is where HIV criminalisation exists:right map:prosecution occurred (April 20… 24 Apr 2017
  • Proud and honored to be represented at this important meeting by Dr @LaurelDSprague, the next Executive Director of… https://t.co/xQlRvEV65t 24 Apr 2017
  • @_ARASAcomms We are delighted to be co-hosting thie crucially important meeting for the region. Thanks for creatin… https://t.co/lRx9GR4RKS 24 Apr 2017
  • Germany: Cologne court acquits man with undetectable viral load; judge learns about #UequalsU from expert witness… https://t.co/Lm6SJ8jTAj 15 Apr 2017
  • The HIV JUSTICE WORLDWIDE movement to end HIV criminalisation is growing! https://t.co/vrOq1dfKwE https://t.co/890jSesls6 04 Apr 2017

How this resource addresses the criminalisation of HIV exposure and transmission

HIV, the virus that can lead to AIDS, has from its earliest days been associated with controversy.

Why has HIV generated so much more social, political and ethical debate than other potentially life-threatening illnesses?

  • In large part, the sheer scale of the epidemic: every region of the world is affected, and over 33 million people are living with the condition; more than 2 million have died of HIV-related causes.
  • In addition, although effective treatment is now available for many, the virus has proved a major scientific and medical challenge to understand, to disable and to eliminate.
  • Coupled with this, some of the behaviours that transmit HIV are associated with strong social taboos, and some of the populations most affected by the disease (women; men who have sex with men; people who use drugs; sex workers; migrants; and those living in poverty, for example) are already disproportionately marginalised in society.

These factors have shaped the global response to HIV in complex ways, with major debates and decisions being as much about beliefs and values as about scientific evidence. People often have strong feelings about many HIV-related issues. The most constructive way to engage in the challenges posed by the epidemic is not to ignore this reality, but rather to situate it within a larger framework that examines how emotions inform opinions and how factual information and logical reasoning should inform opinions as well.

The purpose of this resource is to put forth such a framework in relation to HIV and the criminal law. The resource examines the key legal, scientific, ethical and social issues raised by the application of criminal law to HIV exposure and transmission. It is intended to serve as a 'primer' and 'filler' for people needing to understand these issues, as well as providing information on the current situation across the globe. It may be particularly useful for:

  • people living with HIV and their advocates
  • policymakers and lawmakers
  • lawyers, judges, jury members and others involved in criminal prosecutions
  • law enforcement officers
  • journalists
  • health and social workers advising people with HIV in health care and other settings.

This book does not seek to bring readers around to a specific outlook on the criminalisation of HIV exposure or transmission. The intricacies of how people develop and act on their beliefs make it unlikely that there will ever be widespread agreement on some of the issues in this realm. Instead, it provides a guide to thinking systematically about the facts and concepts most relevant to HIV-criminalisation laws, cases and debates.

The essential questions in most cases in which criminal charges are brought for alleged HIV exposure or transmission are:

  • Was the defendant responsible for causing a significant or unreasonable risk of harm to the alleged victim(s)?
  • What evidence exists to support or refute the charges?

In the context of HIV, these seemingly straightforward questions encompass numerous other questions that may engender fierce debate. For example:

  • Is it appropriate to legislate against HIV exposure and transmission, and – if so – what sort of laws should these be? What are the risks of legislating for this behaviour and/or of using existing, non-HIV specific laws to prosecute for HIV exposure or transmission?
  • What harm does exposure to HIV or HIV infection cause relative to other forms of harm?
  • Who should take responsibility for preventing HIV transmission/infection? Do HIV-positive people have more of an HIV-prevention duty than HIV-negative people?
  • What constitutes a significant or unreasonable risk of HIV exposure or transmission?
  • How does biological, epidemiological and behavioural evidence support or refute the arguments that are put forth about HIV-related responsibility, risk and harm?
  • What impact do such prosecutions have – on individuals, on their relationships with others (both professional and personal), on public health, and on communities at a wider level?

This resource delves into these and related issues in chapters on laws, harm, responsibility, risk and proof.

In addition, an introductory chapter provides an overview of the issues involved in this topic. It includes an overview of HIV, AIDS, modes of transmission and the legal concepts that have shaped thinking and action in this arena for over two decades. The chapters Impact and Fundamentals discuss, respectively, the impact of criminalising HIV transmission and/or exposure, and alternative legal and policy tools for accomplishing HIV-prevention goals.

And finally, the chapter Details, which provides a summary of the history and current legal situation (accurate at 1 June, 2010) in countries that have chosen to criminalise any element of HIV exposure or transmission, illustrates the global implications of such laws and policies.

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.