Preface

Twitter

  • Bahrain: Proposed law would require people with HIV to obtain judges' permission to marry http://t.co/9j7A2ucXuf 14 May 2013
  • US: Excellent article by @ariezrawaldman explaining why HIV criminalisation laws are unjust and how to move forward http://t.co/Uad9wNbt5H 14 May 2013
  • China: Guangdong Province revises policy preventing people with HIV from being teachers http://t.co/eKNqKH6YRy 14 May 2013
  • Greece: @zoemavroudi quotes sources saying health provision 39a, which enabled 2012 'sex workers' HIV criminalisation cases, to be repealed 14 May 2013
  • Advancing #HIV #Justice coming soon from @gnpplus and @hivjusticenet http://t.co/mYGhEEgj1S 10 May 2013
  • US: REPEAL ACT to modernise HIV criminalisation laws reintroduced by @RepBarbaraLee with bipartisan support http://t.co/XuwrnrKHai 08 May 2013
  • Australia: Is 'deliberate HIV transmission victim' impact statement true reality of living with HIV? http://t.co/6bbjd9rw7C #stigmaontrial 23 Apr 2013
  • Canada: Toronto police erroneously characterise HIV risk after gay one-night stand as “a toss of a coin” http://t.co/5wEAlZMwjl #HIVCan 23 Apr 2013
  • Grenada: Health Minister claims HIV-specific criminal law needed to prevent ‘deliberate’ transmission http://t.co/wbdNmDyqVj #HIVisnocrime 23 Apr 2013
  • Canada: Expert witness for prosecution, Robert Remis, subject of protest http://t.co/YU05H7WAB0 17 Apr 2013
  • Switzerland: Supreme Court rules that criminal HIV exposure/transmission no longer necessarily a serious assault http://t.co/ykcX3TuC2b 05 Apr 2013
  • Switzerland: Highest Court rules that §122 ('grievous bodily harm') no longer applies to criminal HIV transmission http://t.co/roKcFmd7cm 05 Apr 2013
  • Botswana: Draconian Public Health Bill allowing forced HIV testing, criminalisation provisions approved by Parliament http://t.co/FbpXkyoopH 05 Apr 2013
  • US: Constitutional 'equality' ideals leading to law that could harass, control, criminalise people with HIV in Kansas http://t.co/k3sJak4ptM 04 Apr 2013
  • Great piece on anti-criminalisation advocacy by @EdgeOnTheNet 'Advocates Urge Repeal of U.S. Laws Criminalizing HIV' http://t.co/4oDd0gZJCI 04 Apr 2013
  • Taiwan: Moral panic continues as gay man is indicted for alleged 'intentional' HIV transmission to many others http://t.co/Vy9UIvJypZ 04 Apr 2013
  • US: Minnesota Supreme Court to rule on HIV-specific criminal statute in State of Minnesota vs. Daniel James Rick http://t.co/aIky6wLmpV 03 Apr 2013
  • US: Well-meaning bill to repeal Maryland’s HIV-specific criminal law may do more harm than good, advocates warn http://t.co/6sq1QvcVtJ 03 Apr 2013

It is a pleasure and a privilege for both of us to endorse this important new book on HIV and the criminal law from NAM – one of us is living with HIV, each of us has been closely involved for many years in the struggle for justice, rationality and fairness in the epidemic, and both of us feel deeply that criminal laws and prosecutions are in most instances wrong-headed, counter-productive and damaging to effective prevention, treatment and anti-stigma initiatives.

The book is not only thoroughly researched and authoritative – it is very timely, since an epidemic of ill-judged laws and prosecutions targeting people living with HIV is superimposing itself upon the heavy cost that AIDS is already exacting from men and women throughout the world. This is particularly so in Africa, where many states have adopted punitive laws, but also in Western Europe and North America.

The book is timely for a further reason. In June 2010, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) launched the Global Commission on HIV and the Law

Both of us agreed to serve on the Commission. We did so because as lawyers we have always believed that laws have a central role to play in the epidemic – but that those laws should be rational, based on sound epidemiology and physiology, and directed at diminishing rather than increasing the impact of the epidemic.

Hence the Commission’s work – which is to see how laws can support, rather than block, effective HIV responses and to develop actionable, evidence-informed and human rights-based recommendations – seemed to be well-timed and important.

Over the next 18 months, the Commission will focus on some of the most difficult legal and human rights issues in HIV. These include criminalisation of behaviours and practices such as drug use, sex work and consensual adult same-sex sexual relations.

The Commission will also explore the increasing trend across the world towards punishing non-disclosure of HIV, and exposure to and transmission of HIV. The devastating human and legal consequences of these laws will form one of our focuses.

For even though the epidemic has been identifiably present for nearly 30 years, there is still much work to be done – not only in bringing life-saving treatment to everyone who faces death from AIDS, but in shaping insights about how best to deal with AIDS. The grief, pain and loss the pandemic inflicts can make us angry. Ignorance of how HIV is transmitted can make us fearful. HIV-related stigma can make us respond irrationally to those living with the virus.

The public – and policy- and law-makers – may feel frustration with the slow progress being made in HIV prevention. That spawns the temptation to demand more draconian measures – including criminal measures.

However, profound ethical and legal problems arise from the blunt, often misshapen and ill-directed instrument of the criminal law.

As in any area of the law, it is imperative that we base our policies and programmes not on ignorance, fear, stigma, political expediency or pandering to public opinion. That leads to what one of us has dubbed "highly inefficient laws". We must be rational. We must judge fairly. And calmly. Good laws, and good policy responses, can be founded only on good data. We must look not for any laws – but for effective and just laws that help slow the spread of HIV. We must learn from the best experiences of others, while recognising the unique character of each legal jurisdiction.

This means that policymakers, law enforcement officials, prosecutors and judges, and those reporting and writing about such things, must work with caution.

This book will, we think, be very helpful to the Commission. By exploring whether laws, and individual prosecutions for potential or actual HIV exposure or non-intentional transmission, do more harm than good to public health and human rights objectives, this book feeds right into the work of the Commission.

The book is well-structured, carefully stated and authoritative. It argues a point – that criminal laws and prosecutions should be used with dread – but does so with insight, evidence and empathy. 

Through its information and the authority with which it uses its arguments, this book makes an important contribution to global understanding of policy in the epidemic.

For the first time a history of the global reach of laws and prosecutions, and all of the evidence – covering the history and all of the medical, social, ethical, political and judicial issues – are gathered together in one place, helping to contextualise the impact of the criminal law on individuals living with, and vulnerable to, HIV and how such laws and prosecutions impact upon society.

By helping us to understand the impact of criminal law on the spread of HIV, and on the lives of those living with the virus, this book establishes its importance and authority within the writing on the epidemic.

The Hon. Michael Kirby AC CMG

Edwin Cameron, Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.