Non-sexual HIV exposure or transmission


  • How everyone living with HIV in Canada became a potential criminal #HIVcrim #hivisnotacrime 09 Aug 2017
  • RT @AIDS_Free_World: Attention lawyers attending @icasa2017 – Sign up to volunteer your time at our Legal Consultation Center:… 06 Aug 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: Ask questions, listen to solutions and insights on HIV, TB and Law. LIVE STREAMING NOW: #ARD201704 Aug 2017
  • RT @TeamPrepster: PrEP17 is an open access film + we're happy for folks to host their own showings - just like Drs did in Ldn today! https:… 20 Jul 2017
  • Find out what is happening around the world in the global movement to end #HIVcriminalisation 19 Jul 2017
  • RT @AIDS_Free_World: What is the impact of HIV criminalization? Visit to learn more. | #HIVcrim #HIVJusticeWorldwid18 Jul 2017
  • US Advocates launch Consensus Statement on HIV “Treatment as Prevention” in Criminal Law Reform #HIVcriminalisation 16 Jul 2017
  • Apply now for the first European HIV Academy for Enabling Legal Environments, September 13-14, Berlin:… 12 Jul 2017
  • RT @AIDS_Free_World: Criminal laws are being used to regulate, control & punish people living with #HIV. Learn more about #HIVcrim: https:/… 12 Jul 2017
  • When will Canada justice department announce new approach to prosecuting cases of HIV non-disclosure? 11 Jul 2017
  • RT @PositiveLiteCom: Samantha's takeaway from - Rethinking Justice: the 7th Symposium on #HIV Law & Human Rights #H06 Jul 2017
  • RT @kenpinkela: SHARE far and Wide - Beyond Blame: Challenging #HIV Criminalization @TheSeroProject #HIVisNotaCrime… 05 Jul 2017
  • RT @CATIEinfo: How do news stories about HIV criminalization impact Black communities? Find out in “Skewed Stories.”… 05 Jul 2017
  • Africa: Moving towards revolutionising approaches to HIV criminalisation This two-day global meeting co-hosted... 04 Jul 2017
  • RT @SylvieBeaumont: Rejoignez le mouvement pour mettre fin à la pénalisation du VIH! #HIVJUSTICEWORLDWIDE #CriminalisationVIH… 28 Jun 2017
  • RT @_ARASAcomms: ARASA are proud founding partners of HIV Justice Worldwide.We can make #hivjusticeworldwide a reality!… 28 Jun 2017
  • RT @AIDS_Free_World: .@AIDS_Free_World is thrilled to be a part of #HIVjusticeworldwide, working to end #HIV criminalization. Learn more: h… 28 Jun 2017
  • #Jointhemovement to #EndHIVcriminalisation! #HIVJUSTICEWORLDWIDE #HIVisnotacrime 27 Jun 2017
  • Thanks to @TheAgenda and @namshine for covering this important topic so thoroughly and empathetically… 20 Jun 2017
  • Our Global Co-ordinator @edwinjbernard is interviewed in @PositiveliteCom about the future of #HIVcrim in Canada 20 Jun 2017

Non-sexual acts that most commonly provide the impetus for criminal cases of alleged HIV exposure or transmission include:

  • spitting

  • biting

  • fighting

  • wounding or threatening to wound with HIV-infected needles.

In all of these cases, the critical issue of whether there is any risk of HIV exposure relates to whether there is enough virus in the infectious fluid to potentially transmit HIV to someone.


Laboratory studies have found that saliva may contain HIV, and transmission via saliva is therefore biologically plausible. However, there is absolutely no epidemiological evidence to suggest that spitting on someone could expose them to enough HIV for infection to result. Levels of HIV in saliva are not high enough to allow transmission, even if the saliva comes into contact with a mucous membrane such as that of the eye. Spitting into someone's mouth would create the same risk as kissing – zero.

There may be an extremely small risk of HIV exposure if someone is spitting blood – for example, following a punch to the face – and this blood comes into contact with a mucous membrane or open wound. However, even in such a scenario, the blood is likely to be mixed with saliva, which, as discussed above, contains an enzyme that inhibits HIV. No cases of HIV transmission resulting from the spitting of blood have ever been reported.1

Case study: Texas, United States – HIV-positive saliva as a 'deadly weapon.2 In May 2008, a 42 year-old African-American homeless man living with HIV was sentenced to 35 years in prison by a Dallas court. His 'crime' was to spit at a police officer whilst stating that he was HIV-positive during his 2006 arrest for being drunk and disorderly. One of the reasons for the man's extremely long prison sentence was that he had done this several times before. The other reason was that the jury found that – despite scientific evidence presented to the court regarding the impossibility of infection through saliva – he had intended to harm the policeman using his saliva as a deadly weapon. The legal argument, as in most other HIV-related spitting cases in the United States, was focused on his intent rather than the actual harm spitting could cause. In contrast, it should be noted that only four of the United States' HIV-specific criminal exposure laws specify intent as one of the elements for guilt. The case was a cause for great concern for human rights and HIV advocates. Bebe Anderson of US civil rights organisation, Lambda Legal, noted: "Such criminal prosecutions confuse the public about ways in which HIV can be transmitted, and encourage discrimination and violence against those who have been infected with the virus. They also undermine the credibility and effectiveness of the criminal justice system as a central vehicle for encouraging respect for society's laws and protecting members of the public from preventable harm... Misconceptions about the ways in which HIV can be transmitted to another person are harmful for society at large, in part because they result in unfounded fears. Those misconceptions are especially harmful for people living with HIV, who continue to face stigma and discrimination, often based on those types of misconceptions."


HIV transmission by biting is possible but extremely unlikely. In order for transmission to take place there would need to be both exposure to blood and a route into the body for that blood. Just two case reports have documented infection via this pathway when deep wounds were exposed to a substantial amount of blood in the biter’s saliva.3,4 However, there have been many more case reports where a bite by somebody with HIV did not result in HIV infection.5


Bleeding onto intact skin during a fight poses no HIV exposure or transmission risk. If HIV-infected blood comes into contact with broken skin, then HIV transmission is possible but still unlikely. The small number of case reports documenting HIV transmission via this route involved a significant amount of blood from the HIV-positive person, as well as large open wounds in the other person’s skin.6

Wounding with a needle

The risk of HIV transmission from exposure to an HIV-infected needle outside healthcare settings has not been studied. However, despite media reporting that often suggests that the risk is great, there is not a single recorded case anywhere in the world of someone being infected with HIV through an attack with a needle, or by accidental wounding with a needle outside healthcare settings.5

Studies of healthcare workers have found the risk of HIV infection following a needlestick injury to be low. A large analysis of multiple studies estimated a per-needlestick risk of 0.23%, or 1-in-435.7 Risk of infection may be higher if the needle was used in an HIV-positive person’s vein or artery, if the HIV-positive person has a high viral load, if the needlestick injury is deep, or if blood is visible on the device that caused the injury.8


  1. Padian N Transmission of HIV Possibly Associated with Exposure of Mucous Membrane to Contaminated Blood. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep11;46(27): 620-3, July, 1997
  2. Bernard EJ Texas jury concludes saliva of HIV-positive man a “deadly weapon”, sentenced to 35 yrs jail., available online at:, 16 May 2008
  3. Pretty IA et al. Human bites and the risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 20(3):232-9, 1999
  4. Bartholomew CF, Jones AM Human bites: a rare risk factor for HIV transmission. AIDS 20 (4): 631-632, 2004
  5. NAT Guidelines for Reporting HIV: supplementary information. London, 2009
  6. Gilbart VL Unusual HIV transmissions through blood contact: analysis of cases reported in the United Kingdom to December 1997. Communicable Disease and Public Health 1: 108-13, 1998
  7. Baggaley RF Risk of HIV-1 transmission for parenteral exposure and blood transfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS 20(6): 805-812, 2006
  8. Landovitz RJ Clinical practice: postexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection. N Engl J Med 361(18): 1768-75, 2009
This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.