Continuing an upward trend seen over a decade, 36% of the
men taking part in the 2008 London gyms study had had unprotected anal
intercourse in the previous three months, researchers report in an article published
online ahead of print in Sexually
Transmitted Diseases. However this overall increase “masks a more complex
picture” concerning the HIV status of men’s partners, the researchers say.
More unprotected sex now occurs with partners of the same status
than with men of unknown or different HIV status. Moreover, there has been an
increase in the number of men reporting unprotected sex with a main partner
whose HIV status is unknown or different.
Since 1998 an annual survey has been conducted at London gyms which are
popular with gay men. The survey was conducted annually from 1998 to 2005
inclusive and then finally in 2008, when 648 men took part.
Amongst other things, men were asked if they had had
unprotected anal sex in the previous three months and to specify if this was
with a main or casual partner. They were also asked to provide details of their
own HIV status and to say if they knew the HIV status of the partner(s)
with whom they had unprotected anal sex.
When the study was first conducted in 1998, 24% of men
reported recently having unprotected anal intercourse (UAI), a figure which
rose to 36% in 2008.
However both in the 2005 and 2008 surveys, more men reported
having unprotected sex with men of the same HIV status as themselves
(“serosorting”) than with men of unknown, assumed or different HIV status. To put
this in figures, in 2008, 21% reported UAI with men of the same status and 16% reported
UAI with men of unknown, assumed or different status.
Among HIV-positive men, 14% serosorted with casual partners
in 2008. Whereas the number of men reporting this behaviour had been increasing
in previous surveys, it was lower in 2008 than in 2005. Moreover, 10% of
HIV-positive men had unprotected sex with a main partner who was also HIV
positive.
Among men who reported that their last HIV test was
negative, less than 2% serosorted with casual partners. However 21% had
unprotected sex with a main partner whose last HIV test was also negative. The
proportion reporting this behaviour has been increasing since the first survey
in 1998, when 12% reported it.
The researchers express concern about the means by which
HIV-negative men establish that their main partner has the same status. Whereas
four in ten tested together, the others talked about their status. The authors
consider this unsatisfactory as the accuracy of the information shared will
depend on the time since the last test and on subsequent risk behaviour.
Turning now to unprotected sex with partners whose HIV
status may be different, primary relationships appear to be where an increasing
amount of risk taking is occurring, although absolute figures remain low.
Comparing the 2005 and 2008 surveys, there have been
significant increases in the numbers of men reporting having unprotected sex
with a main partner of unknown, assumed or different HIV status.
Among HIV-negative men, 2.1% reported this in 2005, rising
to 5.5% in 2008. In almost all cases, the partner’s HIV status was unknown or
assumed to be the same, rather than known to be different.
Among HIV-positive men, 2.5% reported this in 2005, rising
to 8.1% in 2008. In approximately half these cases, the partner’s HIV status
was known to be HIV-negative.
Turning to unprotected sex with casual partners of an
unknown or assumed HIV status, a significant proportion of HIV-positive men
(19%) report this, although this figure is much lower than in surveys earlier
in the decade.
Fewer than 6% of HIV-negative men report this behaviour, the
lowest level reported in any of these gym surveys. The researchers comment:
“This is an encouraging trend and is likely to reflect consistent and sustained
health promotion campaigns targeting gay men.”
Summing up, the researchers say that their data “suggest
that main partners may have become an important source of HIV risk among London’s gay men.” They
recommend that more health promotion campaigns should focus on HIV risk within
relationships and on HIV testing among couples.