Monitoring kidney function
Regular kidney function monitoring is the best way to prevent kidney problems whilst taking antiretroviral therapy. Such monitoring should include, at minimum, measurement of serum creatinine and phosphate, as well as analysing the content of the urine. However, many experts prefer more sophisticated measures such as creatinine clearance and glomerular filtration rate.
Kidney function screening should be performed before starting antiretroviral therapy; the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends that this be done at the time of HIV diagnosis[1]. Ongoing monitoring should then be performed regularly during treatment with potentially toxic drugs.
The IDSA recommends periodic kidney function monitoring during the first six months, then twice annually for patients taking indinavir. The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) guidelines advise that patients receiving tenofovir should be monitored every month for the first year, then every three months. Patients who have pre-existing kidney impairment, are taking other potentially nephrotoxic drugs, or are otherwise at increased risk should receive more frequent monitoring, as often as every few weeks.
It is important that kidney function monitoring continue throughout the course of treatment. Whilst drug-related kidney toxicity typically emerges during the first six to twelve months, later emergence of kidney stones and tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity has been reported[2]. More frequent kidney function monitoring is recommended for children.
latest aidsmap news
- High rate of death amongst patients with HIV diagnosed late
- CD4 cell count increases sustained up to five years in developing-world treatment programmes
- Raltegravir may have role in PEP if exposure involves drug-resistant HIV
- Excellent outcomes from five years of antiretroviral use in Botswana
- Study explores verbal and non-verbal communication in unprotected sex between men
- IL-2 provides quick ‘AIDS rescue’, but effect does not always last
- Once-a-day etravirine should work as first-line treatment
- Second-line combinations fail twice as often as first-line ones in the first year
- If you can't switch, better to stay on failing treatment than stop it, studies show
- Non-nucleoside resistance is efficiently transmitted within infection ‘clusters’
