- 935U83
- A-74704, A-77003 & A-80987
- AL-721
- ALX40-4C
- AMD3100
- Aplaviroc
- Ampligen
- Atevirdine
- Aztec
- BB-10010
- Butyl DNJ
- Capravirine
- Castanospermine
- Compound Q
- DAPD
- DFC (dexelvucitabine)
- DMP-450
- dOTC
- DPC 083
- DPC 681 and DPC 684
- DPC 961 and DPC 963
- Emivirine
- FLT
- GEM 92
- GW420867X
- KNI-272
- L-697,661
- Lithium gamma-linolenate
- Lodenosine
- Loviride
- Oxpentifylline
- Quinotaline
- RO033-4649
- Ro 24-7429
- SC-52151 & SC-55389A
- SID791
- SPC3
DFC (dexelvucitabine)
DFC is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) which was under development by Pharmasset Pharmaceuticals and Incyte. Its generic name is elvucitabine and its trade name was to be Reverset. DFC was formerly known as DPC-817 whilst under development by Du Pont and then Bristol-Myers Squibb. It is also known as D-d4FC.
DFC is a cytidine analogue that is active against viruses resistant to AZT (zidovudine, Retrovir) and 3TC (lamivudine, Epivir). It is also active against viruses with thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) such as the 215 mutation, but not against the multinucleoside resistance mutations Q151M or 69SS. The drug is closely related in structure to racivir, another NRTI being developed by Pharmasset.
Development of DFC was stopped in April 2006 following dangerous elevations of the enzyme lipase in the blood in patients taking 200mg DFC without 3TC or FTC (emtricitabine, Emtriva) in study 901.
Effectiveness
DFC has a long half-life and a favourable side-effect profile, with no known mitochondrial toxicity or raised lactate levels. Studies demonstrated that once-daily DFC is well tolerated and effective in treatment-naive patients, and those with resistance mutations for other NRTIs.
One dose-ranging study study compared buffered and enteric-coated formulations of DFC in 18 HIV-infected men, and found that the enteric-coated formulation did not produce 5FC, a breakdown product that may cause toxicity. After 48 hours, the mean viral load reduction from a single dose of D-D4FC was 0.37 log10 with the lowest dose of 10mg. One subject with resistance mutations indicating prior exposure to AZT and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) experienced a viral load drop of 0.61 log10 (Murphy 2003; Stuyver 2004).
In a second study, 30 treatment-naive patients were randomised to receive placebo, or 50, 100 or 200mg DFC once daily for ten days. All three treatment groups showed a large decrease in viral loads during treatment, with the patients receiving 200mg showing a mean decrease in viral load of 1.77 log10 by day 10. Genotype analysis failed to find any new mutations in the virus isolated from these patients and pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed that the maximal plasma concentration of DFC in the patients receiving 200mg was higher than the levels required to inhibit the activity of HIV with mutations associated with AZT, d4T (stavudine, Zerit), 3TC or tenofovir (Viread) treatment. Similarly, in treatment-experienced patients failing their current antiretroviral drug regimen, adding once-daily 200mg DFC to their current regimen for ten days led to a mean fall in viral load of 0.8 log10 (Murphy 2004).
A phase IIb trial of DFC in the United States, Germany and France has shown that the drug is active in treatment-experienced patients. The 199 patients were first randomised to add one of three doses of DFC or placebo to their failing drug regimen for two weeks. This caused a 0.7 log10 drop in viral load in the 200mg group, significantly greater than the placebo, 50mg and 100mg groups. The drugs effects were unaffected by co-administration with tenofovir (Viread), AZT or abacavir (Ziagen). However, its activity was lower if combined with the similar drugs 3TC or FTC (emtricitabine, Emtriva). It was the extension of this trial in patients who were not taking 3TC or FTC that led to the observation of increased lipase levels and the discontinuation of the drug.
Resistance
A test-tube study has found that the following mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene cause resistance to DFC: I63L, K65R, K70N, K70E and R172K (Hammond 2005).
References
Hammond JL et al. In vitro selection and analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistant to derivatives of beta-2',3'-didehydro-2',3'-dideoxy-5-fluorocytidine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 3930-3932, 2005. Murphy RL et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of the nucleoside reverset following single doses in HIV-1 infected patients. Second International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, Paris, abstract 545, 2003. Murphy RL et al. Potent anti-HIV-1 activity of ReversetTM following 10 days of monotherapy in treatment-naï¶¥ individuals. Fifteenth International AIDS Conference, Bangkok, abstract MoOrB1056, 2004. Stoddart C et al. Activity of the cytidine analog Reverset (RVT) against 3TC-resistant HIV-1 in SCID-hu Thy/Liv mice. HIV DART, Naples, Florida, 2002. Stuyver LJ et al. Potent antiviral effect of reverset in HIV-1-infected adults following a single oral dose. Antivir Ther 9: 529-536, 2004.
latest aidsmap news
- High rate of death amongst patients with HIV diagnosed late
- CD4 cell count increases sustained up to five years in developing-world treatment programmes
- Raltegravir may have role in PEP if exposure involves drug-resistant HIV
- Excellent outcomes from five years of antiretroviral use in Botswana
- Study explores verbal and non-verbal communication in unprotected sex between men
- IL-2 provides quick ‘AIDS rescue’, but effect does not always last
- Once-a-day etravirine should work as first-line treatment
- Second-line combinations fail twice as often as first-line ones in the first year
- If you can't switch, better to stay on failing treatment than stop it, studies show
- Non-nucleoside resistance is efficiently transmitted within infection ‘clusters’
