- Home
- News
- Treatment & Care
- HIV Worldwide
- Living with HIV
- Preventing HIV
- Organisations
- HIV Basics
- About Us
- The mechanisms of HIV transmission
- Anal and vaginal transmission
- Oral transmission
- Circumcision
- Woman-to-woman transmission
- Other sexual practices
- Sharing injecting equipment
- Medical and dental procedures and injuries
- Blood transfusions and blood products
- Mother-to-baby transmission
- Transmission of drug-resistant HIV
- Transmission: Low and 'theoretical' risks
- Impossible routes of HIV transmission
- Infection control
Blood transfusions and blood products
HIV transmission through blood transfusions
As of June 2005, 440 HIV infections had been identified in the UK as a consequence of blood/tissue transfer. Those infected through blood transfusions have been identified in the following ways:
- After a donor of blood was subsequently discovered to be HIV–positive and recipients of infected blood were traced
- After testing HIV–positive and where no other risk exists
- Upon the development of symptoms of HIV infection – either seroconversion illness or severe immunodeficiency.
Blood donations in the UK have been screened for HIV antibodies since October 1985 and people in high risk groups for AIDS have been requested to refrain from giving blood since 1983. Unlike Factor VIII, which is extracted from blood, whole blood for transfusion is not heat-treated.
Only two cases of HIV infection by blood transfusion were reported in the UK between 1985 and 1997, but two further cases were reported in 1997 by the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre. They were traced to one donor who had given blood prior to seroconversion.
There have been 57 cases of patients testing positive whose risk factor was blood or tissue transfer between June 1999 and June 2005, but all of these patients acquired their HIV from blood transfusions abroad.
Despite fears that many infected donations would slip through the safety net of HIV antibody testing, there have been remarkably few cases, suggesting that self–policing by people in high risk groups since 1983 has also played a major role in ensuring that blood transfusions are not a continuing source of infection.Rate of infection from HIVinfected transfusions
Not all recipients of HIV–infected blood seroconvert. A 1989 study of 220 recipients of blood from HIV–positive donors found that 85 were HIV–negative. Those who seroconverted were more likely to have received large quantities of blood and/or to have received blood from a donor who subsequently developed AIDS less than two and half years after giving blood.
Those who progressed to AIDS within seven years of the transfusion were more likely to have received large quantities of blood when transfused, and to have been more severely ill (measured by length of stay in hospital). After seven years 49% of the recipients of infected blood were estimated to have progressed to AIDS. Those who had received blood from donors who developed AIDS within two and half years of giving blood were more likely to have developed AIDS within four years than those who didn't (Ward).
Transfusing your own blood
In order to protect themselves against HIV infection, some people choose to have their own blood used in transfusions, a practice known as an autologous transfusion. This practice is becoming increasingly common in the United States and some European countries, and patients often say that it makes them worry less about the chance of HIV infection.
In fact, autologous transfusions are more important as a source of protection against other more common infections transmitted by transfusions which cause post–operative complications, such as CMV. Such transfusions also reduce the stress placed on the immune system by a transfusion of foreign proteins, so they may benefit people with HIV too. An infusion of foreign blood proteins can activate the immune system and boost HIV replication and infection of new cells. Unfortunately blood may not always be suitable for autologous transfusion; some people may be too weak or anaemic to benefit from autologous transfusions.
Blood transfusions abroad
In certain other countries infection through blood transfusion is a much higher risk.
The most up–to–date and reliable information about the risks of blood transfusion abroad is likely to be available from:
- MASTA at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (0891–224100)
- The Foreign and Commonwealth Office Consular Department's Travel Office (020 7270 3000)
- If you are employed abroad, from your employer.
The UK NGO AIDS Consortium has published a manual for employment by voluntary organisations working abroad which includes material for employees.
References
Ward JW: The natural history of transfusion–associated infection with human immunodeficiency virus: factors influencing the rate of progression to disease, NEJM 321(14): 947–952, 1989.
Blood products
Awareness of people with clotting or bleeding conditions (i.e. Haemophilia) has existed for 2,000 years. It was not, however, until the early part of this century, that bleeding disorders were classified as haemophilia A or B (Christmas Disease) and Von Willibrand's disease (VW). VW can affect either men or women. Haemophilia A and B affect only men, although women carry the haemophilia gene, which will affect half their male offspring.
All three conditions are produced by an inability to produce a protein which causes blood to clot after an injury. The condition has varying degrees of severity. Some people with haemophilia only bleed after a severe injury, but some people will bleed very easily, even after a minor knock and many of these bleeds are internal. Bleeds in joints are particularly disabling as eventually the joints will seize up, causing severe arthritis. Many people with haemophilia have been disabled for some time and, even before the advent of HIV, 35% were receiving state benefits.
In the 1970s doctors started replacing the deficient protein (Factor VIII in haemophilia A and VW and Factor IX in haemophilia B) with blood products or factor concentrates. Such small quantities of protein are present in blood that donations from up to 30,000 people had to be pooled to produce one batch. The results of infusion with concentrates were excellent, and by the mid 1970s people with haemophilia were injecting themselves with Factor VIII at home with the onset of a bleed.
However these transfusions were often contaminated with the hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses. By the late 1970s 100% of people with Haemophilia treated with pooled Factor VIII had come into contact with these viruses. The problem was blamed on imported Factor VIII and in 1977 the British government pledged to become independent in blood supplies.
