Early
infant HIV diagnosis (EID) is becoming more frequent, according to a
retrospective multi-country analysis in Cambodia,
Namibia, Senegal and Uganda
in 2009, researchers announced today at the Eighteenth International AIDS
Conference in Vienna.
The 2010
World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend all infants infected with HIV
under two years of age begin antiretroviral treatment regardless of CD4 count
or disease stage. Without antiretroviral treatment an estimated 50% of children
with HIV will die before the age of two.
HIV DNA
testing is necessary to make a definitive diagnosis in children below 18 months
because of the persistence of maternal antibodies up until this age.
The use of
dried blood spots (DBS) has simplified sample collection as it is a less invasive
procedure for infants, and facilitates storage and transportation to laboratories equipped
to carry out DNA testing using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, so
providing a means in resource-poor settings for early infant diagnosis.
The study reported
on Tuesday was led by the respective ministries of health with technical
support from UNICEF.
The
researchers reviewed a selection of 18 to 25 collection sites in each country,
covering the geographic range of health centres, HIV service availability and
time since the start of EID services; transportation and central laboratory
components were also reviewed. A
standardised questionnaire was used to look at sample volume and programme
practice and key informant interviews at the national level looked at programme
management and scale-up.
Future
planning must take into account the effects of decentralisation of EID services,
noted Matt Barnhart of UNICEF.
Out of a
total of 84 EID collection sites reviewed, with over 21,000 infants tested, geographical
coverage varied from 9% in Senegal
to 86% in Namibia.
While sample collection has increased significantly in all four countries, service
use remained under 50%, ranging from 30 to 40% at most sites.
In spite of
decentralisation, service use was clustered in all four countries, representing
just 2%, 8%, 9% and 9% of all potential sites in Namibia,
Cambodia, Senegal and Uganda, respectively. Dr. Barnhart
suggested this was due, in part, to lack of training and supervision in many
sites. The samples were simply not being sent for testing. The issue that needs
to be addressed, he stressed, is that of organisation of services and care at
the sites. Additionally, he noted the possibility that patients found certain
sites more accessible and allowed for anonymity.
While all
national algorithms used encourage testing at six weeks, late age at diagnosis
was common. Fewer than one half of infants tested were tested in their first two
months of life, Dr. Barnhart noted. He added, “So coverage of the optimal
service
– early testing
– is even lower.”
The average
ages were 5.3 months, 4 months, 4.4 months and 7.2 months in Cambodia, Senegal,
Namibia and Uganda,
respectively. However, some variations in age were seen in more established EID
programmes that had been in operation for more than two years; in Uganda the average age in
January 2008 was 7.4 months and in October 2009 6.1 months; in Namibia in
January 2006 the average age at diagnosis was 6.2 months falling to 3.3 months
in August 2009, indicating an improvement as the programme matured.
Of those
infants who ever tested positive the numbers who were enrolled in care, remained
alive and on antiretroviral treatment were low, ranging from 25 to 45%.
These
figures, Dr. Barnhart noted, underline the missed opportunities for early
testing that include prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) follow-up
appointments after delivery, and scheduled vaccination visits to the clinic.
A focus on
the timely use of testing services for EID leading to comprehensive treatment
and care services is essential to further the success of treatment in
HIV-infected infants and children, Dr.Barnhart stressed.
He also
highlighted the differences in ease of scale-up which depends on pregnant women
knowing their status. For example, coverage of early infant diagnosis is significantly
higher in Namibia where, according
to the presenters, 80 to 100% of HIV-positive pregnant women know their status,
compared to Cambodia and Uganda where only an
estimated 66 to 68% of women know theirs.
While these
findings provide further opportunities to improve early infant diagnosis
services, many improvements for HIV-exposed infants have been made: PMTCT
coverage is increasing; the availability of infant testing services is growing;
and
– of critical importance
– children do respond extremely well to
antiretroviral therapy if tested early enough and so treated early, said Dr
Barnhart.
He
acknowledged the many challenges that are severely limiting the impact of EID:
for example, late age at testing; centralisation of services; and slowly rising
service coverage. However, with these findings, he added, ministries of health
have already begun to plan, pilot and address the gaps to improve the survival
of HIV exposed infants.
Dr
Francois Venter, in an earlier satellite session on early infant diagnosis, explained that where he works, in a busy urban setting in Johannesburg, “Over the past few years the
numbers of infants getting tested has increased fivefold, yet the numbers on
treatment hasn’t budged one iota.” He cautioned, “If the system is not there to
support the area, it doesn’t matter how good the test is.” He suggested that
the outcome, that is the numbers of children on treatment [and remaining in
care] is a useful barometer for how well a public health system serves the most
vulnerable and those most in need.
Under
current circumstances, with relatively low utilisation of infant HIV diagnosis,
adoption of
the new WHO guidelines on immediate treatment of all children under two with HIV
infection will not significantly increase the numbers of children with HIV
found to be eligible for treatment, according to another poster presentation of
research undertaken in Uganda
using a real-life cohort followed since 2003.
The
researchers found that only half of all children eligible, no matter the criteria
used (CD4 cell count, disease stage or age), would be put on treatment. As with
the four-country analysis, the crucial component, according to Martina Pennazzato
and colleagues, is improving timely access to early infant diagnosis.
The
researchers applied WHO guidelines of 2006, 2008 and 2010 separately to a
cohort of 985 children with a median age of five years, ten months, followed since 2003.
The proportion
of those eligible for antiretroviral treatment was identified, as well as the
probability of starting antiretroviral treatment over time.
In accordance
with the guidelines of 2006, 2008 and 2010, 40%, 57% and 66% of all
children, respectively, would have been eligible for treatment at enrolment. The probability
of not being on treatment two years later following these criteria would have
been 24%, 16% and 12%.
No matter
the criteria used (CD4 cell count, clinical stage or age) to identify eligibility,
only half of all eligible children ever started antiretroviral treatment. After
2008, age was the least used criteria to identify eligibility (OR 10.5 95% CI:
3.8 to 3.11).
Martina
Pennazzato noted that, in this implementation stage of the guidelines:
paediatric
programmes linked to prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT)
programmes were more likely to enrol infants and young children.
the wide
dissemination and implementation of the guidelines was critical; together with
being able to counter the scepticism of some of those working in the field who,
while knowing it is the right thing to do, often think twice about putting asymptomatic
infants on treatment because of the challenges involved.
Future
planning requires looking at how to improve current EID services as well as
scaling-up to ensure infants and children are started on treatment early enough to
make a difference in health outcomes.