Research in Tanzania shows
that women with HIV who took vitamin A and beta-carotene (VA/BC) supplements
had more HIV in their breast milk than those who did not, while women who took
multivitamins were more likely to develop mastitis. Both are major risk factors
for HIV transmission during breastfeeding
The discovery of
an association between vitamin A supplementation and HIV in breast milk may
help to explain an unexpected finding from an earlier study of the same group
of women.
After enrolling
1078 HIV-positive pregnant women into intervention and control arms to
investigate the potential benefits of nutritional supplementation, researchers
observed that children born to mothers in the VA/BC arm were more likely to
acquire HIV during breastfeeding.
Earlier
observational studies had suggested that low maternal vitamin A levels might
increase the likelihood of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, raising the
question of whether supplementation could have a protective effect. The latest
findings, published online by The
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition on August 25th, instead provide
further evidence of adverse consequences.
HIV-positive
pregnant women in the Tanzanian cohort were randomly assigned to four arms: one
receiving VA/BC (5000 IU preformed vitamin A plus 30 mg beta-carotene); one receiving
VA/BC along with multivitamins (20 mg thiamine, 20 mg riboflavin, 25 mg vitamin
B-6, 100 mg niacin, 50 mg vitamin B-12, 500 mg vitamin C, 30 mg vitamin E, and 0.8 mg folic
acid); one receiving placebo along with the multivitamin regimen; and one receiving
only placebo.
The recently
published study sought to examine the effects of VA/BC and multivitamins on HIV
shedding in breast milk. Researchers randomly selected 720 research
participants from the larger cohort, then eliminated those who had not provided
adequate breast milk samples for analysis. The resulting substudy population
was comprised of 594 women.
When researchers
compared the pooled group of women from the two VA/BC treatment arms (VA/BC
alone and VA/BC plus multivitamin) to the pooled group of women from the two
non-VA/BC arms (placebo plus multivitamin and placebo alone), they found
significant differences.
Detectable viral
load levels were found in the breast milk samples of 51.5% of women in the
VA/BC group, but in those of only 44.8% of women in the non-VA/BC group
(p=0.02). The lower limit of detection was 100 viral copies/mL.
Women
participating in the study had been asked to provide breast milk samples
approximately every three months postpartum. While not everyone had done so,
enough samples were available from throughout the postpartum period for
researchers to look at whether the effect of VA/BC changed with time.
Significant
viral load differences associated with VA/BC were not evident until six months
postpartum; from that point onward, women in the VA/BC group were 34% more
likely than their counterparts to have detectable viral load levels in breast
milk (95% confidence interval, 4% – 73%).
A related study
published online by the Journal of
Nutrition on August 25th implicates both VA/BC and multivitamins in
subclinical (asymptomatic) mastitis, which is known to be a risk factor for
HIV.
Women are most
likely to develop mastitis, an inflammation of the breast tissue, while
breastfeeding. Although breastfeeding is not recommended for HIV-positive women
who have the option of using infant formula, many HIV-positive women in
developing countries breastfeed out of necessity.
The study looked
for a biological marker of subclinical mastitis in breast milk samples from the
cohort of 1078 Tanzanian women. Six hundred and seventy-four women had provided
one or more samples, and a total of 1642 samples underwent testing.
Researchers
compared the original three intervention arms (VA/BC alone; VA/BC plus
multivitamin; placebo plus multivitamin) to the placebo arm.
The risk of
severe subclinical mastitis was found to be 45% higher in the VA/BC arm than in
the placebo arm (p=0.03).
Additionally,
women in the placebo-plus-multivitamin arm were 33% more likely than women in
the placebo arm to have any subclinical mastitis (p=0.005), and 75% more likely
to have severe subclinical mastitis (p=0.0006).
Similar analyses
were performed after stratifying women into two CD4 cell count levels: <350
cells/mm3 and ≥350 cells/mm3. The only intervention arm
to show a significant difference was the multivitamin arm, in which women with
higher CD4 cell counts had a 49% higher risk of any subclinical mastitis
(p=0.006).
The finding of
more subclinical mastitis among women taking VA/BC fits with the association
between VA/BC and HIV transmission during breastfeeding, and in fact points to
a possible biological pathway for that outcome.
However,
researchers were surprised to see the apparently negative impact of taking
multivitamins during pregnancy and breastfeeding. They speculated that
multivitamins might have enhanced the women’s inflammatory response to the
infection causing the mastitis.
Members of the
same research group previously documented a number of important health benefits
for both mothers and infants when women took multivitamins. The most recent
findings thus raise the question of whether or not potential benefits outweigh
potential risks.