Concerns that HIV treatment may lead to increased rates of unprotected sex and a decline in condom use need to be considered in the context of the very substantial reduction in the risk of HIV transmission when viral load is fully suppressed, researchers from Cameroon reported on Monday at the Sixth International AIDS Society conference (IAS 2011) in Rome.
Results
from a study of patients starting antiretroviral therapy in rural hospitals in
Cameroon (Cohen) indicate that, while sexual activity increased after the
initiation of treatment, and unprotected sex reverted back to baseline after an
initial decline, the increase in the proportion of patients with undetectable
HIV, and therefore much less infectious, more than compensated for an increase in otherwise risky behaviour.
The
other significant finding in the study was that patients who reported poor
communication with their healthcare staff were nearly twice as likely to report
not always using condoms while having a detectable HIV viral load, though
whether this is cause or effect cannot be shown.
The
Stratall ANRS 12110/ESTHER study was a
French study of 459 patients, 70 of them women, initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in rural
hospitals in Cameroon. Its primary aim was to compare clinical outcomes in people
randomised either to receive clinical care based on symptoms alone or on
symptoms plus laboratory monitoring. Results announced at this year’s Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
(Kouanfack) indicated a slight, but significant advantage for
laboratory monitoring – see
this report for more details.
An
important aspect of the Stratall ANRS
12110/ESTHER trial was that sexual behaviour in participants was assessed too.
Previously, there have been relatively few studies of the effect of initiating
HIV therapy on sexual and risk behaviour of patients in developing countries.
A paper presented at the International AIDS Conference
in Vienna last year (Marcellin) found that the proportion of trial participants
having sex did increase after the initiation of ART, as did sex with
serodiscordant partners. In this study, sexual behaviour data was collected
from 447 of the participants. They found that the proportion of patients
reporting sex doubled over the two years of the study from 32% at the start of
therapy to 60% two years later. The proportion of participants who had sex
involving inconsistent condom use (ICU) with partners not known to be
HIV-positive (SD-ICU) was 57% in participants who had not been having sex at
baseline and 76% in participants who had.
This
raised concerns about the potential for increased access to HIV treatment to
restart high rates of HIV transmission. However, this paper did not factor in
the reduced infectiousness of patients with viral suppression.
The paper presented this year added to this data. It measured sexual behaviour only
in patients where full data from every visit both on sexual behaviour and viral
load were available, a total of 290 patients.
It
found that about a third of patients at any one time had a detectable viral
load (over 40 copies/ml), with this proportion declining slightly from 37% six
months after therapy initiation to 32% two years after.
In
common with the Vienna study, it found that the proportion of patients
admitting to no or inconsistent condom use (ICU) declined after initiation of
therapy from 67% at baseline to 40% at month six but then started increasing
again, to 55% at month 24.
However, due to the effects of treatment, the proportion of patients who were
defined as ‘susceptible to transmitting HIV’ (STH), in other words using condoms inconsistently
while not being virally suppressed, remained steady through the study. While
64% of patients at baseline were in this group, only 23% were at month six and
22% at month 24. Increased levels of sexual activity were therefore balanced
out by an increased rate of viral suppression.
The
investigators found that treatment reduced an individual’s susceptibility to
transmitting HIV by 86% at month six and 89% at month 24.
Other factors related to being ‘STH’ included having more than one
sexual partner (2.4 times the risk of being STH) and having sex more than once a week
(twice the risk). Another risk factor was ‘limited readiness of health staff to
listen’. All of these factors were statistically significant.
The last factor was assessed using a six-point multiple-choice patient
questionnaire that asked patients to rate the quality of their relationship
with healthcare providers; those rating the poorest quality of communication
with healthcare staff were 80% more likely to report susceptibility to
transmitting HIV, though from this trial it cannot be shown whether poor
communication was responsible for sexual risk or both were symptomatic
of underlying factors like depression.