2006 guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1 urge all people aged 13 to 64 to undergo HIV antibody testing as a routine medical screening test. Everyone should be tested at least once, and people at high risk of HIV infection should take an HIV test at least once every year.
The change in stance on testing had been under discussion for several years, and was broadly supported by doctors, HIV advocacy groups and public health officials as a way of reducing the number of people diagnosed late in the course of HIV disease, when treatment may be less effective.
Proponents of the policy highlight that there has been limited progress in preventing sexual HIV transmission, while when routine testing has been applied (blood donations, antenatal screening) the approach has been effective in limiting further HIV transmission. The CDC approach places the emphasis on public health and departs from years of a testing strategy based on civil rights, driven by informed consent and pre- and post-test individual counselling. The CDC also argues that routine testing reduces stigma associated with testing that requires assessment of risk behaviour.
In order to make testing more straightforward, pre-test counselling is kept to a minimum, and instead of signing a separate consent form for the HIV antibody test, patients are considered to have given consent when they sign a standard medical consent form covering all routine procedures. CDC says that patients should be specifically informed that HIV testing is part of routine care and have the opportunity to decline testing. Before making this decision, patients should be provided with basic information about HIV and the meanings of positive and negative test results, and should have the opportunity to ask questions.
However, prevention counselling should be offered when feasible, “especially when the healthcare visit is related to substance abuse, sexual health, family planning, or comprehensive health assessments.”
Patients at high risk of HIV infection, who will be encouraged to test at least once a year, are defined as all heterosexuals and men who have sex with men, who have had more than one sexual partner since their last HIV antibody test, or whose sexual partners have had more than one sexual partner since their last test. Injecting drug users and their partners, persons who exchange sex for money or drugs, and sexual partners of HIV-positive people are also included in this category.
Healthcare providers should encourage patients and their prospective sexual partners to be tested before initiating a new sexual relationship, the guidelines state.
The guidelines also emphasise the need for increased vigilance during pregnancy, with the recommendation that repeat HIV testing should be provided in the third trimester not only for women at high risk for HIV, but also for women in areas with high HIV prevalence among women of childbearing age or in facilities with at least one HIV diagnosis per 1000 pregnant women screened. They also specify that a rapid HIV test should be used during labour for all women whose HIV status remains unknown at the time of delivery.
However, an analysis in 20072 found that routine HIV testing contravenes many US state laws requiring pre-test counselling, disclosure of information, and patient informed consent. Legal issues pertaining to health and public health are predominantly under state jurisdiction; the CDC, while influential, does not have the authority to impose any changes on state statutes or regulations. Since the new recommendations for routine testing were issued in 2006, there had been almost no move toward amending state laws to allow such testing, and many states had in fact strengthened their position on the need for consent and counselling.