Treatment intensification with sofosbuvir permits cure after failure of previous HCV treatment

Keith Alcorn
Published: 17 November 2015

Re-treating with an interferon-free regimen that previously failed to cure hepatitis C can result in success if treatment is intensified with the addition of sofosbuvir, two studies presented at the 2015 AASLD Liver Meeting have shown.

Although direct-acting antiviral treatment results in cure rates above 90% in most groups of patients with hepatitis C genotypes 1 and 2, including people with cirrhosis, a small proportion of people experience viral relapse. For those with advanced liver disease it may not be possible to wait until new drugs become available, and other options are needed.

One concern is that failure of a regimen that contains an NS5A inhibitor (ledipasvir in Harvoni, ombitasvir in Viekira Pak / Viekira) may result in the emergence of NS5A-resistant virus that can take up to 96 weeks to disappear. NS5A inhibitors may have some activity against these variants, but further treatment with an NS5A inhibitor could result in higher-level resistance if hepatitis C is not rapidly suppressed. Adding an agent of a new class could increase antiviral activity.

Two companies presented data at the Liver Meeting showing successful re-treatment when sofosbuvir was added to the regimen used previously, or people were re-treated with a new regimen to which they might have some resistance. Merck reported findings from a study of treatment intensification in people who failed a short course of treatment lasting less than eight weeks with its investigational protease inhibitor/NS5A inhibitor combination, and AbbVie reported findings from a study of treatment intensification in people who failed treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir (Viekira Pak / Viekirax & Exviera)(paritaprevir levels are boosted by ritonavir).

Merck: C-SWIFT re-treatment study

Merck’s C-SWIFT re-treatment study looked at the effect of adding sofosbuvir and ribavirin to elbasvir (NS5A inhibitor) and grazoprevir (protease inhibitor) in people with genotype 1 infection who had experienced virologic relapse after treatment with elbasvir and grazoprevir given for four, six or eight weeks. Twenty-five people who had experienced relapse in the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic arms of the C-SWIFT study were enrolled, a median of 214 days after virologic failure in the C-SWIFT study.

Participants were predominantly male (88%) with a mean age of 54 years. 88% had genotype 1a infection, and 20% had cirrhosis. 80% had baseline NS5A resistance mutations, 52% had baseline NS3 protease mutations, and 44% had some resistance to both drug classes. None had resistance mutations in the NS5B polymerase region targeted by sofosbuvir.

Treatment was given for 12 weeks, and 12 weeks after the completion of treatment all participants had a sustained virologic response. Two participants were lost to follow-up at day 3 and week 4.

Overall, treatment was well tolerated with only one serious adverse event. Two people discontinued ribavirin due to pruritus and anaemia respectively, but went on to achieve SVR12.

AbbVie: QUARTZ-1 study

AbbVie’s QUARTZ-1 study examined the impact of adding sofosbuvir and ribavirin, or sofosbuvir alone, to its Viekira Pak / Viekira & Exviera regimen. The open-label study recruited 22 participants who had experienced viral failure or relapse after first-line treatment with a variety of regimens, not restricted to AbbVie’s own combination. Participants were assigned as follows:

  • Genotype 1a, no cirrhosis (n = 14): 12 weeks of treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir, plus sofosbuvir and ribavirin.
  • Genotype 1a, cirrhosis (n = 6): 24 weeks of treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir, plus sofosbuvir and ribavirin.
  • Genotype 1b, with or without cirrhosis (n=2): 12 weeks of treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir, plus sofosbuvir.

Paritaprevir levels are boosted by ritonavir.

All participants with genotype 1a and cirrhosis had been treated previously with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir. Ten out of 14 genotype 1a participants without cirrhosis had received ombitasvir, paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir (8) or ombitasvir and paritaprevir/r (2). Four of the remaining six had received an HCV protease inhibitor in combination with either sofosbuvir or an experimental agent

Those receiving treatment for 12 weeks had the option of continuing treatment for a further 12 weeks if HCV was still detectable at week 12. In the event one participant with genotype 1a infection received extended treatment.

Twelve weeks after the completion of treatment 14 of 15 participants who had received 12 weeks of treatment had a sustained virological response (SVR12). One participant experienced virological relapse; this patient had no evidence of baseline resistance.

In those who received 24 weeks of treatment post-treatment virologic data to week 4 (SVR4) show no cases of virological relapse.

Over half of participants had at least one mutation associated with resistance to NS3 protease inhibitors, and over half had at least one mutation associated with resistance to NS5A inhibitors.

The single virological failure occurred in a participant previously treated with telaprevir (a first-generation HCV protease inhibitor), pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

References

Lawitz E et al. C-SWIFT Retreatment (Part B): 12 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir with sofosbuvir and ribavirin successfully treated GT1-infected subjects who failed short-duration all-oral therapy. AASLD Liver Meeting, San Francisco, abstract LB-12, 2015.

Poordad F et al. QUARTZ-1: Re-treatment of HCV genotype 1 DAA failures with ombitasvir, paritaprevir/r, dasabuvir and sofosbuvir. AASLD Liver Meeting, San Francisco, abstract LB-20, 2015.

Hepatitis information

For more information on hepatitis visit infohep.org.

Infohep is a project we're working on with the World Hepatitis Alliance and the European Liver Patients Association.

Visit infohep.org >
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.