The role of human rights in the global response to HIV

Twitter

  • Greece: Five (of 26) women in mass HIV criminalisation "sex worker" case acquitted http://t.co/LnDGFZJrfV 20 Mar 2013
  • US: Kansas to repeal ban on quarantining people with HIV, allow forced HIV testing following bodily fluids exposure http://t.co/jFZsLeD4Wg 20 Mar 2013
  • US: Illinois cop accused of HIV non-disclosure to be prosecuted under old unscientific HIV-specific law http://t.co/uZka8cQvTE #HIVisnocrime 18 Mar 2013
  • Canada: Police training and guidelines in criminal HIV non-disclosure cases urgently required http://t.co/twsGT55EBl @AIDSLAW #HIVCan 14 Mar 2013
  • Germany: National AIDS Council releases powerful policy statement on HIV criminalisation http://t.co/0vpT4r4kui #HIVisnocrime 13 Mar 2013
  • US: New study to explore effects of HIV criminalisation on health department policies and programmes http://t.co/S2qVzCXSuy 13 Mar 2013
  • UK: New research calls for better guidance for HIV service providers on criminal law, confidentiality and ethics http://t.co/0GdgIvxgQV 07 Mar 2013
  • New UK report from @SigmaResearch1 finds #HIV #criminalisation impact on healthcare workers and service providers http://t.co/85aCJmytz3 28 Feb 2013
  • US: HIV Experts Urge Minnesota Supreme Court to Consider the Science of HIV Transmission http://t.co/nNUJeEWymF 24 Feb 2013
  • @aidsactioneurop Thank you very much for publicising this important initiative. 20 Feb 2013
  • The latest HIV Justice Newletter is out today, on the one year anniversary of the Oslo Declaration http://t.co/W8ovLJG6 13 Feb 2013
  • UK: Updated guidance on HIV transmission, the law and the work of the clinical team now published http://t.co/E77K5uPd 13 Feb 2013
  • Nigeria: Advocates successfully argue for removal of HIV criminalisation clause from draft HIV Anti-Discrimination Act http://t.co/yZl6EMmU 13 Feb 2013
  • Australia: NSW man with HIV who "spat blood" on arresting officer pleads guilty to assaulting and intimidating police http://t.co/dxg7WUeL 12 Feb 2013

How societies treat [HIV-positive] people will not only test fundamental values, but will likely make the difference between success and failure of AIDS control strategies at the national level. To the extent that we exclude [HIV-positive] persons from society, we endanger society, while to the extent that we maintain [HIV-positive] persons within society, we protect society. This is the message of realism and of tolerance.

Dr Jonathan Mann, founding director of WHO’s Global Programme on AIDS, 1987.1

Jonathan Mann, the founding director of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s Global Programme on AIDS, which later evolved into UNAIDS, gave voice to the idea that social injustices and limits on basic rights and freedoms can have direct and indirect effects on the health of individuals, communities and populations.2

Experts have long argued that the disruptive power of HIV-related stigma requires that HIV be treated differently from other infectious disease pandemics. See the chapter: Harm for more on how 'HIV exceptionalism' has had an impact on the perception of HIV's harm.

In the context of HIV, this leads to a paradox: despite strong moral arguments to apply punitive approaches to the prevention of HIV transmission, a rights-based approach is considered to be a more effective way to promote the type of behaviour modification required to mitigate the epidemic. Only then, it is argued, will individuals at risk of, and living with, HIV be able to act on the messages and access the means necessary for self-protection and the protection of others.3

Human rights have informed the global response to HIV in many ways. While the right to health is in itself an exhortation to respond broadly to the epidemic, numerous other rights are relevant to an effective response to the epidemic, including the rights to:

  • privacy
  • non-discrimination and equality before the law
  • liberty and security of person
  • freely receive and impart information
  • freedom of movement
  • participate in public life
  • share in the benefits of scientific advancement.

These and other rights find expression in legal, policy, advocacy and programmatic approaches to HIV prevention and treatment. In the legal realm, for example, most countries are parties to international treaties that obligate them to legally respect, protect and fulfil key human rights. These rights also serve as norms guiding policy and advocacy work on many HIV-related issues. And, at the programmatic level, human rights provide an important framework for developing and implementing HIV prevention and treatment interventions.4

References

  1. Mann J Statement at an informal briefing on AIDS to the 42nd Session of the United Nationals Special Assembly. October 20, 1987
  2. UNAIDS HIV, Health and Human Rights: the legacy of Jonathan Mann today. see www.unaids.org, 2008
  3. UNAIDS Human rights and HIV. See www.unaids.org, accessed 11 July 2010
  4. Jürgens R and Cohen J Human Rights and HIV/AIDS: now more than ever - 10 reasons why human rights should occupy the center of the global AIDS struggle. New York:Open Society Institute, 2009

HIV Justice
Network

RSS Feed

A writer and advocate on a range of HIV-related issues, Edwin has a particular specialism in HIV and the criminal law. He works with national and international HIV organisations, including the International AIDS Society, GNP+ and UNAIDS, as well having as a long association with NAM as a writer on this topic and as the former editor of HIV Treatment Update. To visit Edwin's blog and respond to posts click here.

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.