The General Medical Council (GMC, an
official body responsible for regulating doctors in the UK) published
supplementary guidance on confidentiality in respect to serious communicable
diseases in 2009.1 This document reinforces and clarifies the
guidance given to doctors in other GMC guidance with respect to HIV, hepatitis
B and C and tuberculosis.
Confidentiality is considered to be central
to trust to doctors and patients; there is a public interest in having a
confidential medical service. However, in some rare situations, disclosure of
personal information without a patient’s consent “may be justified in the
public interest if failure to disclose may expose others to a risk of death or
serious harm.”
Of particular note are the following three
recommendations to doctors:
-
“You should explain to patients how they
can protect others from infection, including the practical measures they can
take to avoid transmission, and the importance of informing sexual contacts
about the risk of transmission of sexually transmitted serious communicable
diseases.”
-
“You may disclose information to a known
sexual contact of a patient with a sexually transmitted serious communicable
disease if you have reason to think that they are at risk of infection and that
the patient has not informed them and cannot be persuaded to do so. In such
circumstances, you should tell the patient before you make the disclosure, if
it is practicable and safe to do so. You must be prepared to justify a decision
to disclose personal information without consent.”
-
“When you are tracing contacts and
notifying partners, you should not disclose the identity of the patient, if
practicable.”
It is worth noting that the GMC outline the
possibility of informing the sexual contact of a patient, but not that of
informing the police or another authority. Moreover, it is a possibility rather
than a legal requirement.
These are among the points clarified and
explored in a briefing paper on HIV
transmission, the law and the work of the clinical team.2 Following on from an initial version produced in 2006, in April 2010 the
British HIV Association (BHIVA) and the British Association for Sexual Health
and HIV (BASHH) issued an updated briefing paper. However, please note that the
version being described here is a draft that was open for consultation at the
time of writing.
The document describes the roles and
responsibilities of healthcare professionals, with two having central
importance: the duty to properly advise; and the duty of confidentiality. The
main points are listed here:
-
Healthcare professionals have a central
role to advise and support patients. A failure to advise on how a patient can
protect his or her sexual partners from infection could give rise to legal
liability if a partner became infected.
-
Healthcare professionals also have a duty
to maintain the confidentiality of patient information unless the patient has
consented to disclosure, or disclosure is necessary in the public interest.
There is individual and public interest in maintaining confidentiality.
-
For HIV-positive individuals, advice must
include the routes of HIV transmission and how to prevent transmission, with
information about safer sexual practices, the use of condoms and post-exposure
prophylaxis. The issue of viral load and infectiousness should be discussed,
but the professional should make it clear that the Swiss statement3 is
not universally accepted. The legal situation should be described.
-
Discussion of sexual-health needs must take
place regularly, according to relevant BASHH guidelines, to enable the giving
of appropriate advice on an ongoing basis.
-
It is important, when considering breaching
confidentiality, to weigh up all potential harm as there may be situations
where disclosure of HIV status to protect a sexual partner results in
considerable harm to an individual e.g. domestic violence.
-
In situations where a healthcare
professional believes that an HIV-positive individual continues to put close
contacts at risk their duties and subsequent action depend upon the type of
contact:
A close contact
who is also a patient of the healthcare worker: there is a duty of care,
a
legal obligation to disclose.
A close contact
who is not a patient of the healthcare worker: there is no duty of care,
there
is a power to disclose, but no legal obligation.
-
There is no
identified close contact: as there is no identifiable person to disclose
to,
the healthcare worker’s duty is to counsel and support behaviour change.
-
No information should be released to the
police unless there is verified consent from the patient or there is a court
order in place.
-
It is up to an individual patient to make a
decision about complaining to the police, and healthcare workers should remain
impartial during discussions with patients.
-
Those involved (complainant and defendant)
in cases of reckless transmission are likely to need specialist legal advice
and support and referral to THT direct would be appropriate.
For more details, please see the document
posted on BHIVA’s website (www.bhiva.org).
Guidelines specific to psychologists were published
by the British Psychological Society’s Faculty of HIV and Sexual Health in
2009.4 Much of the advice echoes that given above. However, the
importance of maintaining a safe and trusting therapeutic relationship is
emphasised. The guidelines outline a duty for psychologists to inform their
clients of the potential legal consequences of non-disclosure and unprotected
sex, but only if these issues come up. If the issue has not arisen as relevant,
discussing it may raise anxiety and undermine the therapeutic relationship.
The guidelines also outline specific steps
to be taken if breaching a client’s confidentiality is being considered. It is
made clear that, as with any other ethical dilemma, the psychologist should not
act alone but consult with colleagues and managers. The responsibility for
breaking confidentiality in the interest of public safety does not rest with
any particular individual, but is shared with the clinical team, manager and
NHS trust.