The ethics of responsibility

Edwin J. Bernard
Published: 18 July 2010


  • The HIV JUSTICE WORLDWIDE website is now available in Russian. Join the movement to end HIV criminalisation!… 07 Mar 2019
  • Веб-сайт HIV JUSTICE WORLDWIDE теперь доступен на русском языке. Присоединяйтесь к движению, чтобы положить конец… 07 Mar 2019
  • RT @BurtonTracey: @GlobalFund @UNDP @Follow_SALC Strategic litigation, legal defense + advocacy efforts are vital tools to counter the crim… 06 Mar 2019
  • RT @UNAIDS: “We are in danger of lifting our foot off the pedal so close to the finish line," says British MP @lloyd_rm about the HIV respo… 06 Mar 2019
  • RT @GlobalFund: Meet Wesley. He's a lawyer in #Malawi working with the Southern Africa Litigation Centre to protect the rights of people li… 06 Mar 2019
  • RT @AIDSLAW: Mark your calendars! The Legal Network's biannual symposium on HIV, law and human rights is happening June 14. All are welcome… 06 Mar 2019
  • URGENT REQUEST @EqualityJa needs your support following a devastating fire causing severe damage to their HQ. PLEAS… 29 Jan 2019
  • Breaking news: Belarus has agreed to reform its draconian HIV criminal law, to allow consent to potential or percei… 19 Dec 2018
  • Still much more to do in Belarus and in the EECA region, but let's take a moment of gratitude for all the amazing a… 19 Dec 2018
  • Breaking news: Belarus agrees to reform its draconian HIV criminal law, to allow consent to potential or perceived… 19 Dec 2018
  • Breaking news: the December edition of the HIV Justice Worldwide newsletter is out now!… 12 Dec 2018
  • Thanks for sharing the links to our collection of Regional HIV Criminalisation Reports covering Francophone Africa;… 12 Dec 2018
  • RT @KELINKenya: Despite global consensus amongst experts that unjust HIV-specific laws weaken states ability to #EndAIDS, Kenya's Section 2… 10 Dec 2018
  • We are happy to be working with GNP+ and others towards this goal: specifically on ending state-sponsored HIV-relat… 10 Dec 2018
  • Don't forget people living with HIV who ourselves may also be one (or more) of these 'key populations'. 10 Dec 2018
  • The decision to bring the International AIDS Conference to the United States under the Trump administration means t… 10 Dec 2018
  • RT @gnpplus: Fear of stigma & discrimination stop many ppl from accessing the HIV prevention, treatment, care & support they need. Join the… 10 Dec 2018
  • HIV JUSTICE TOOLKIT now available in French | Boîte à outils VIH JUSTICE maintenant disponible en français 10 Dec 2018
  • La boîte à outils francophone de HIV JUSTICE WORLDWIDE pour plaidoyer contre la pénalisation du VIH est en ligne 10 Dec 2018
  • Solidarity and support for the #PositiveJustice campaign launched today to end #HIVcriminalisation in Kenya. Thank… 10 Dec 2018

For many, the discussion of responsibility and HIV transmission raises difficult and uncomfortable issues about individual morality, moral behaviour, and appropriate roles of government and public health agencies in addressing the rights and responsibilities of persons living with HIV and those who are uninfected. We acknowledge that some see this issue as one with very clearly defined sides that represent “right” and “wrong” behavior, for example, where any sexual activity between an individual who knows he or she is infected and an uninfected person represents a lapse of moral judgment. However, this perspective fails to recognize the very low relative risk of some sexual behaviors, the complexities of sexual relationships, and the motivations and autonomy of uninfected persons who willingly and knowingly enter into sexual relations with HIV-seropositive partners.

Ann O’Leary and Richard Wolitski, (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009.1

In November 2007, the UNAIDS Secretariat and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) hosted an international consultation on the application of the criminal law to potential or actual HIV exposure or transmission.2 The consultation included representatives of other United Nations agencies, parliamentarians, members of the judiciary, criminal law experts, civil society representatives and people living with HIV.  Their discussions highlight the difficult moral, ethical and practical issues raised by such criminalisation.

UNAIDS consultation participants unanimously agreed that potential or actual exposure to HIV that did not result in transmission was not 'harmful' enough to criminalise and that criminal liability for HIV transmission should never fall on people living with HIV who:

    • are not aware that they are HIV-positive

    • do not know how HIV is transmitted.2

Consultation participants further agreed that there should be no criminal liability for HIV transmission if the person living with HIV has done at least one of the following prior to consensual sex:

  • Taken measures to reduce the risk of HIV exposure, such as using condoms or otherwise practising HIV-related risk-reduction methods

  • Disclosed their HIV-positive status to their partners or reasonably believed their partner had consented to the risk of HIV exposure.2

They also agreed that obligated disclosure is not ethically necessary and that “[u]nlike the case of deliberate deceit, in the case of simple non-disclosure the partner of the HIV-positive person has not been misled into basing choices on wilful misinformation. Having a criminal law requiring disclosure of HIV infection would fall most heavily upon those whose circumstances already make it difficult to disclose.”2

They noted that "sexual activity, with any partner, always carries some risks of harm. A person engaging freely and voluntarily in sex does not necessarily need to know the HIV status of the sexual partner. He or she may choose not to engage in certain sexual acts so as to avoid the higher degree of risk they pose, may choose to take preventive measures to lower the risk to a level they find acceptable (such as using condoms), or may choose to engage in unprotected sex aware that a risk of HIV transmission may exist.”2

However, consultation participants were divided over the more difficult issue of whether someone who has neither disclosed nor taken HIV risk-reducing measures should be criminally liable if transmission has resulted. Some expressed the belief that there was a moral and ethical difference between non-disclosure and “deliberately deceiving someone as to the risk of harm of engaging in unprotected sex.” These participants argued that such 'sins of commission' may be criminalised if there was no legitimate justification or excuse for such deception, such as fear of violence. Nevertheless, they appreciated that this moral and ethical distinction may be too difficult to legislate for, and/or to prove, or defend.2

For more on how the criminal justice system approaches the criminality of the defendant’s state of mind see the chapter: Proof 


  1. O’Leary A and Wolitski RJ Moral agency and the sexual transmission of HIV. Psychol Bull.135(3):478-94, 2009
  2. UNAIDS/UNDP International Consultation on the Criminalization of HIV Transmission: Summary of main issues and conclusions. Geneva, 2008
This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.