A pilot project in which people with
HIV encouraged their friends and neighbours to be tested for HIV succeeded in
recruiting people with a very high rate of undiagnosed HIV, Elizabeth Reddy of Duke University
told the Sixth International AIDS Society conference (IAS 2011) in Rome yesterday. People who themselves had
just tested for HIV also recruited people for testing, but with a lower
proportion of their contacts being found positive.
The project is a modification of a
partner notification scheme. Partner notification involves people with a
sexually transmitted infection (often when newly diagnosed) identifying their
sexual partners, who will be informed of their possible exposure to infection
and encouraged to be tested themselves.
Recently, pilot projects in seven
American cities found that asking people with HIV to contact friends and other
people in their social network who may be at risk of HIV infection (rather than
sexual partners) also succeeded in bringing a large number of people with
undiagnosed infection forward for testing.
The project presented at the Rome conference was established in the rural Kilimanjaro
region of northern Tanzania,
where the estimated prevalence of HIV is 1.9%. The project asked individuals to
offer vouchers with details of testing services to their sexual partners,
family, friends and neighbours.
At three villages, mobile voluntary
counselling and testing services were being offered, and all eleven people who
tested positive at these sites during the study period were asked to recruit
others and were given vouchers. Moreover, a random sample of 312 people testing
negative were provided with vouchers.
At the HIV care and treatment centre
(up to 20km away), a random sample of 75 patients with HIV were also
given vouchers in order to recruit others to be tested.
When recruiters passed the vouchers
on to their contacts, the recipients could either test at one of the mobile
sites or at the treatment centre, with travel costs reimbursed.
Looking first at the total of 323
recruiters who had themselves just tested for HIV, they accepted 702 vouchers
from clinic staff, of which 46 were brought in by people seeking testing (a
quarter of whom had never tested before).
One individual was diagnosed with
HIV as a result.
The results were particularly
impressive for the contacts of recruiters who were receiving care at the HIV
treatment centre. The 75 recruiters accepted 249 vouchers, and this resulted in
41 individuals coming in for testing (over half of whom had never previously
tested).
Most importantly, 13 of those tested
(one third) were newly diagnosed with HIV. This contrasts with the local
prevalence of 1.9%.
The researchers calculate that for
the recruiters from the treatment centre, nine vouchers were distributed for
each person eventually tested, whereas for the recruiters from the testing
sites, 35 vouchers were distributed per test.
Although the project had aimed to
encourage the testing of sexual partners, only 14% of people tested were
partners. Testers were more likely to be friends or neighbours (48%).
The vouchers were linked, via a
code, to the recruiter. This made it clear that not all recruiters did actually
make referrals that resulted in people getting tested. In the case of
recruiters from the treatment centre, successful referrals were more likely to
be made by people who were somewhat older, people who had disclosed their HIV
status outside the home and people who came from villages with no HIV testing
facility. More people came forward to the treatment centre than to the mobile
testing sites.
The
researchers concluded that, when working with patients at the treatment centre,
this scheme was successful in recruiting high-risk testers.