Study identifies characteristics of gay men who may be suitable for intermittent PrEP

Michael Carter
Published: 06 June 2012

Older, better-educated gay men who use sexual networking sites and have sex outside the context of committed relationships may be appropriate targets for intermittent pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), US research published in the online edition of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes suggests.

The investigators found that individuals with this profile were more likely to plan their sexual encounters and to have anal sex fewer than three times per week.

“Our study serves to better characterize MSM [men who have sex with men] who may most benefit from event-based intermittent PrEP,” comment the authors.

The iPrEX study involving gay and other MSM showed that PrEP significantly reduced the risk of acquiring infection with HIV.

However, adherence is a major barrier to the success of PrEP. There are also concerns about its cost and potential side-effects. Intermittent dosing has been proposed as a way of overcoming these limitations. A recently published study showed that adherence was also challenging when an intermittent dosing strategy was used.

This treatment strategy involves taking a dose of antiretroviral therapy before a risky sexual encounter, with a second dose taken shortly after.

This strategy will only be suitable for people who engage in risky sex fewer than three times per week, and who plan their sexual encounters.

Investigators in the US wished to establish a better understanding of the characteristics of gay men and other MSM who fulfilled these criteria.

HIV-negative gay men were recruited to the study using social networking sites in late 2010. All were sexually active (defined as anal sex within the previous month). The men supplied demographic data, as well as information about their sexual risk behaviour, how they planned their sexual encounters, their use of sexual networking media and their relationship status.

A total of 1013 men participated in the research. Their median age was 28 years. Most (56%) participants reported that their last anal sex was unprotected.

When asked about their sexual activity in the previous week, 49% of men reported that they had had no sex, 27% said they had had sex once and 9% reported sex on two days. The remaining 15% of men said they had had sex on three or more days.

Half the men reported that their last sexual encounter involved no advance planning, and for 8% of men planning consisted of a few minutes notice before the event. The remaining men reporting planning sex hours (22%), one to three days (11%), or more than three days (8%) in advance.

In all, 31% of men reported both less frequent sex and planning sex and were therefore potential candidates for intermittent PrEP.

Factors associated with less frequent sex and its planning were older age (median 30 vs 27 years, p < 0.001), higher likelihood of completing a college education (46 vs 32%, p < 0.001), an HIV test within the past twelve months (54 vs 47%, p = 0.033), use of sexual networking sites at least once a week (55 vs 44%, p = 0.001) and last sexual encounter with a non-committed partner (60 vs 38%, p < 0.001).

“Additional knowledge regarding sexual frequency and planning will be crucial in identifying MSM who may benefit from this intervention [intermittent PrEP]”, conclude the investigators. “With use of tenofovir/FTC as PrEP, daily dosing will still remain necessary for the majority of high-risk MSM who report more frequent sexual activity or less planning.”


Volk JE et al. Sexual frequency and planning among at-risk men who have sex with men (MSM) in the US: implications for event-based intermittent pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, online edition. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31825bd87d, 2012.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.