Single-tablet regimen improves antiretroviral adherence and reduces hospitalisation

Scott Sutton, from the Dorn Veterans Administration Medical Center and the University of South Carolina, speaking at ICAAC 2013.
Published: 26 September 2013

Antiretroviral treatment that requires only a single tablet taken once daily were associated with better viral suppression, higher adherence and lower likelihood of hospitalisation, researchers reported at the 53rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) this month in Denver.

Modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens are much better tolerated and more convenient than early combinations that sometimes required handfuls of pills to be taken multiple times a day. It is well known that taking ART as directed most of the time leads to better viral suppression, and studies generally find that lower pill burden is associated with better adherence. But it is less clear whether taking one instead of two pills at a time, or taking them once or twice daily, has a significant effect on treatment adherence and outcomes.

Scott Sutton and colleagues from the Dorn Veterans Administration Medical Center and the University of South Carolina compared viral suppression, medication adherence and hospitalisation amongst US veterans taking single-tablet or multiple-tablet ART regimens.

This retrospective observational analysis used computerised medical and pharmacy records from 15,602 patients who received HIV medications through the Veterans Administration healthcare system between January 2006 and July 2012. Almost all were men, nearly half were black, more than 40% were white and the average age was 52 years. About two-thirds were diagnosed with mental health conditions and 40% with drug or alcohol use disorders.

Participants were categorised in the single-tablet regimen group if they had ever received a one-pill-once-daily regimen at any time during the study period (6191 participants, 40%); others were put in the multiple-tablet regimen group (9411 patients, 60%). Follow-up lasted at least two months without any switches after starting a new regimen.

At baseline, people in the single-tablet and multiple-tablet groups had similar CD4 cell counts (mean 432 cells/mm3). However, participants prescribed a single-tablet regimen were less likely to have undetectable viral load at baseline (42 vs 46%) and more likely to be treatment-naive (28 vs 13%).

Almost everyone in the single-tablet regimen group used Atripla (efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine), a recommended regimen in European and US treatment guidelines. The other available one-pill regimens, Eviplera (rilpivirine/tenofovir/emtricitabine) and Stribild (elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir/emtricitabine), were approved more recently in the US (August 2011 and August 2012, respectively). All single-tablet coformulations are marketed by Gilead Sciences, which provided support for the study.

Atripla and Eviplera include a NNRTI whilst Stribild includes an HIV integrase inhibitor. There are currently no protease inhibitor-based single-tablet regimens. More than two-thirds of participants in the multiple-tablet group took protease inhibitors.

Treatment response rates were high overall in both groups. But people taking a single-tablet regimen were significantly more likely than those on multiple-tablet regimens to achieve undetectable viral load during follow-up (64 vs 60%, respectively).

A significantly greater proportion of people in the single-tablet group achieved at least 95% adherence (75 vs 56%) and at least 80% adherence (90 vs 78%), as determined by pharmacy claims data (medication possession ratio).

People taking a single-tablet regimen were significantly less likely to have been hospitalised during follow-up compared with multiple-tablet recipients (27 vs 31%). They also took longer to be hospitalised and had fewer hospital stays (2.2 vs 2.7, respectively).

In a multivariate analysis controlling for other factors, people taking single-tablet regimen were twice as likely to be at least 95% adherent to treatment (odds ratio 1.98), were 31% less likely to be hospitalised (hazard ratio 0.69) and had 45% fewer hospitalisations (incidence rate ratio 0.56).

"Patients on [single-tablet regimens] had better adherence compared to those on [multiple-tablet regimens]" and had "reduced risk of hospitalisations, fewer hospitalisations and longer time to hospitalisation", the investigators concluded.

After the presentation, session moderator Pablo Tebas and others suggested that the results may be affected by 'channelling bias'. This could include preferentially prescribing boosted protease inhibitors for people with higher baseline viral load or those judged less likely to be adherent, as these drugs are generally more 'forgiving' of missed doses. Another example would be patients with pre-existing kidney disease – a group more likely to be hospitalised – not being put on tenofovir, which is included in all available single-tablet regimens.

"Healthcare providers and payers may see a benefit in improved medication-taking behaviour with ART using a single tablet compared to multiple tablets based on fewer hospital visits and other improvements in clinical outcomes," the researchers suggested in a press release issued by ICAAC. "These clinical outcomes could potentially decrease total healthcare costs in HIV patients."

This suggestion is supported by other studies of US Medicaid participants and commercially insured individuals which similarly found that people taking single-tablet regimens had fewer hospitalisations than those taking multiple pills. Another benefit in the US is that single-tablet regimens require only one prescription co-pay.


Rao GA, Sutton SS, Hardin J, et al. Impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen on adherence and risk of hospitalization in veterans with HIV/AIDS. 53rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Denver, abstract H-1464, 2013. View the abstract on the ICAAC website

ICAAC/American Society for Microbiology. Effects on compliance and risk of hospitalization in veterans with HIV/AIDS taking single tablet vs. multiple tablets. Press release, September 12, 2013. See the text here.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.