An analysis of transmission patterns in Lilongwe, Malawi
shows that even if a highly effective HIV prevention intervention could reach
75% of people in chronic infection, it would never eliminate the HIV epidemic
there. As a result, interventions that reduce transmission during early
infection will also be required, Kimberly Powers told a late-breaker session at
the Eighteenth International AIDS Conference in Vienna last Friday.
There are particular challenges to delivering prevention
interventions to people in early infection. This is a relatively brief period
of time during which people are typically unaware that they are infected.
Current testing strategies and technologies are unable to identify all people
who have early infection.
Early infection refers to first few months of infection.
Time after this is called ‘chronic infection’.
During early infection, especially during the first few weeks, people are exceptionally infectious. Although it is known that a significant
proportion of HIV transmission occurs during this time, previous modelling
studies have given very different results as to the comparative contribution of
early infection. Moreover the proportion is likely to vary from setting to
setting, because of differences in sexual mixing patterns, the number of people
with HIV and the number of people treated.
Kimberly Powers and colleagues wished to understand whether
an HIV prevention strategy could ever be effective if it was only delivered to
people in chronic infection.
They conducted a mathematical model, using data on HIV
prevalence, viral load and sexual behaviour from Lilongwe, Malawi
(a semi-urban setting, with a mature generalised epidemic). Heterosexual
transmission is assumed to occur both within and outside steady partnerships. A
person’s infectiousness was understood to vary over time, including within the
period of early infection.
Using this data they estimated the proportion of HIV
transmissions in Lilongwe that could be attributed to people in early
infection, and found that it was 38% in 2010 (95% confidence interval 19 to 58%).
Earlier on in the epidemic, this proportion was higher, but the figure is
changing as more people live with chronic infection.
The researchers also wanted to predict the reductions in HIV
prevalence which could be achieved by improved testing and prevention
strategies during early infection. They
assumed that a prevention intervention was available which could almost
eliminate onward transmission in those who received it.
They examined a number of scenarios in which the
intervention reached different proportions of people in early infection and in
chronic infection. They assumed that people in early infection would not
receive any intervention at all during the first three weeks of infection. Moreover
their analysis concentrated on scenarios where an intervention reaches up to 75%
of a population, as it is probably unrealistic to expect higher levels of
coverage.
They found that if only people in early infection got the
intervention, then HIV prevalence could be reduced, but never eliminated. If
75% of people in early infection could be reached, prevalence might drop from
around 14% now to 8% in 2030. Reductions would be smaller if fewer people were
reached.
A slightly larger reduction could be achieved if 75% of
people in chronic infection got the intervention, and no one in early infection
got it.
However, if the intervention could reach 75% of people in
chronic infection and 50% of people in early infection, prevalence would drop
to about 1% by 2030. Similar results would be obtained if the intervention
reached 75% of people in each group.
Powers concluded that early infection plays an important role
in the HIV epidemic in Lilongwe,
Malawi. “Our
results suggest that it is time to determine the best ways to identify early
index cases and the optimal prevention strategies to initiate during early
HIV,” she said.