Pharmacy
staff may be just as important as clinical staff in ensuring that patients in
sub-Saharan Africa are not lost to follow-up, according to a large study of public
sector HIV care and treatment clinics in Central
Mozambique.
Higher
pharmacy staff burden was an important predictor of loss-to-follow-up or death
among 12,000 patients starting antiretrovirals, Barrot H Lambdin and colleagues
reported in a retrospective cohort study published in the advance online
edition of the Journal of Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndromes.
There
was no significant association between clinical staff burden and attrition. The
authors suggest that task-shifting partly explained this finding. Additionally,
clinical monitoring needed fewer visits than the required monthly pharmaceutical
visits.
While
patients attending high-volume clinics were at a higher risk for loss-to-follow
up or death than those attending low-volume clinics, this difference was not
statistically significant (p=0.198).
Seven thousand people were on ART in Mozambique
in 2004. This number increased dramatically to 170,000 by the end of 2009.
Mozambique has a
critical shortage of health care personnel with one of the lowest
provider-to-population ratios in the world: three doctors, 21 nurses and three
pharmacy staff for every 100,000 people.
Inadequate
human resource capacity is considered to be one of the most significant
barriers to effective ART delivery in resource-poor settings.
Increasing
patient populations can potentially overwhelm an already overstretched staff
and lead to bottlenecks within the system. So patients would spend more time
waiting for less quality time with their provider leading to patient
dissatisfaction and ultimately higher loss-to follow-up.
The
authors chose to look at how patient volume, health workforce levels (clinical
and pharmacy staff) and patient characteristics affected retention in ART
programmes in Manica and Sofala provinces in Central
Mozambique. Understanding the effect, they note, is critical to
ensure effective delivery of HIV care and treatment.
HIV
prevalence in Central Mozambique is amongst
the highest in the country, at 20.4% in 2004. The first two ART delivery sites
were set up in 2003 and 2004 at Sofala’s Beira
Central Hospital
and Manica’s Chimoio
Provincial Hospital,
respectively.
In
2006 HIV services were integrated into primary health care clinics across the
two provinces’ 23 districts with the aim of improving access to HIV care and
treatment.
77%
(11,793) of those starting ART in the study period were included in the
analysis. Those excluded were under 15 years of age, pregnant or had
transferred to another facility.
At
the end of the study period 63% (7,491) patients were alive and on ART from the
clinics where they started; 16% (1,932) were lost to follow-up and 14% (1,645)
died.
There
were considerable differences among clinics in the number of months providing
treatment, the number of adults starting treatment, patient volume and human
resource levels (clinician and pharmacy staff burden).
Patient
volume is defined as the monthly number of clinical and pharmacy visits;
clinical staff burden as the monthly number of clinical visits for each
clinician and pharmacy staff burden the monthly number of pharmacy visits for
each pharmacy staff person.
The
median number of monthly visits at the clinics was 562 (IQR: 264-1,141). The
average number of clinicians providing care each month was 2.89; and the mean
number of pharmacy staff providing services each month was 1.21.
So
the median monthly number of clinic visits for each clinician was 111
(IQR:61-214); and the median number of pharmacy visits for each pharmacy staff
person was 359 (IQR: 142-609).
After
adjusting for patient characteristics patients attending clinics with medium
pharmacy staff burden HR=1.39 (95% CI: 1.07-1.80) and high pharmacy staff
burden HR= 2.09 (95% CI: 1.50-2.91) tended to have a higher risk for attrition
than those with low pharmacy staff burden (p <0.001).
Even
after adjusting for a year on treatment, clinic location and clinic experience
the association between pharmacy staff burden and attrition became stronger.
Strengths
of the study include standardisation of protocols for delivery of care, patient
tracing and data recording across clinics, note the authors.
The
main limitation, they add, is the observational nature of the study, raising
the possibility that unmeasured patient and clinic factors could bias the
results.
Caution
is needed, the authors add, before generalising these results to other
settings. Clinics were selected if they had an electronic database, not through
a random process.
Attrition
at 12 and 24 months of 32% and 41% respectively, the authors suggest was also
probably due to over 65% of patients starting ART late (WHO Stages III and IV)
and health system bottlenecks.
Nevertheless
the authors conclude “pharmacy staff burden was an important predictor of
attrition” highlighting “a potential area within the health system where
interventions could be applied to improve retention.”