An interaction means that some older anti-epileptic drugs
and antiretroviral therapy should not be used together, a US study published in
the open-access journal AIDS Research and
Therapy shows.
Both types of therapy are metabolised by the body using the
P450 pathway in the liver, reducing levels of anti-HIV drugs and leading to
sub-optimal control of the virus.
Although the theoretical risk of a drug interaction is known from pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers, this study provides strong clinical evidence that older anti-epileptic drugs should not be used in patients taking antiretroviral therapy.
Most of the anti-epileptics used in resource-limited
settings use the P450 pathway, and the investigators believe the ramifications
of the interaction with HIV therapy “may be substantial.”
HIV-positive individuals use anti-epileptic drugs widely. In
addition to controlling seizures, they are also a therapy for neuropathy,
depression and bipolar mood disorders.
Many first-generation anti-epileptic drugs such as
phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital are metabolised by the P450 enzyme.
The same pathway is also used by antiretroviral drugs in the protease inhibitor
and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI) classes as well as the CCR5
inhibitor maraviroc.
Because these medications are metabolised in a similar way
there is a potential for interactions. These could lead to reduced blood levels
of antiretroviral drugs and therefore inadequate control of HIV.
Investigators therefore retrospectively compared virologic
outcomes in patients taking antiretroviral therapy with P450-inducing
anti-epileptics with two control populations.
The first consisted of patients who were taking HIV
treatment and anti-epileptics that did not use the P450 pathway; the second
comprised patients who were only taking HIV therapy.
Virologic failure was defined as lack of viral suppression to
below 400 copies/ml six months after the start of therapy, or a sustained
rebound to above 400 copies/ml after a period of undetectable viral load.
A total of 19 patients were treated with concurrent HIV
therapy and anti-epileptic drugs that used the P450 pathway.
These patients were significantly more likely than the 85
individuals taking anti-epileptics that did not use this pathway to experience
virologic failure (63% vs. 27%; p = 0.009).
After both six and twelve months of therapy, patients taking
the older anti-epilepsy drugs were less likely to have an undetectable viral
load than the patients taking non-P450-inducing epilepsy therapy (33% vs. 71%,
p = 0.016; 36% vs. 75%, p = 0.018).
The risk of treatment failure was increased four-fold for
patients taking P450-using anti-epileptics compared to patients taking epilepsy
drugs that did not use this pathway (OR = 4.19; 95% CI, 1.54-11.44, p = 0.005).
Rates of virologic failure were also higher among the
patients taking older epilepsy therapy when compared to individuals not
receiving anti-epileptics (63% vs. 43%). Differences in outcomes between these
two groups were significant when the investigators took into account baseline
viral load (p = 0.046).
“This study is the first demonstrating clinically meaningful
outcomes in participants receiving overlapping treatment with [P450-inducing
anti-epileptic drugs] and HAART,” comment the investigators.
They emphasise, “the impact is so robust, that we were able
to demonstrate this despite the small numbers of patients receiving
[P450-inducing anti-epileptic drugs.]”
The researchers recommend that wherever possible
HIV-positive patients should receive anti-epileptics that do not use the P450
pathway.
However, in many resource-limited settings the only
available epilepsy drugs are older therapies with a risk of interactions.
In these circumstances the investigators recommend closer
clinical monitoring, and if possible the use of HIV therapy that does not
involve a risk of interactions.
They note that one antiretroviral option would be
raltegravir. But they acknowledge that its price means that it is not readily
available in poorer countries. Another possibly offered by the researchers is triple
NRTI therapy, but the poor virological outcomes associated with such regimens
are also noted.