Lymphoma treatment outcomes just as good for people with HIV

Antiretroviral treatment during chemotherapy greatly improved the chance of successful treatment of aggressive types of lymphoma

Keith Alcorn
Published: 21 February 2018

People with HIV treated for aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Burkitt lymphoma appear no more likely to suffer a relapse after treatment than HIV-negative people treated for the same conditions, according to findings of an analysis of the German HIV Lymphoma Cohort published this month in Haematologica, the journal of the European Hematology Association.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma are AIDS-defining cancers that occur much more frequently in people with HIV than in the general population. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a cancer of lymphocytes (white blood cells) that develops in lymph nodes. The most aggressive form is Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Burkitt lymphoma is a form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that develops in B-lymphocytes and is very aggressive.

Both cancers are treatable with chemotherapy and complete remission is possible in the majority of people treated. Relapse after treatment occurs in about one in ten cases in the general population but German researchers wanted to know if people with HIV suffered higher rates of relapse and whether dose reductions or chemotherapy cycle reductions had any impact on the risk of relapse.

The study looked at people with HIV in Germany treated for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Burkitt lymphoma, plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) or non-classifiable B-cell lymphoma since 2005. The treatment cohort consisted of 387 people, of which 254 achieved remission after the first course of treatment, 21 after further chemotherapy, 22 achieved partial remission (reduction in lymphoma mass of at least 50% and no further spread) and 15 were still receiving chemotherapy at the time of analysis. Of the non-responders, 23 died during treatment, 45 had progressive disease and 7 had received no treatment.

A total of 254 achieved complete remission after the first course of treatment (127 with DLBCL, 91 with Burkitt lymphoma, 29 with PBL and seven with other non-classifiable B-cell lymphomas). This group represented just under two-thirds (63%) of those treated. Complete remission from lymphoma was achieved if there was no visible evidence of lymphoma for at least three months after the completion of treatment. Relapse was defined as 50% growth in a previously abnormal lymph node after complete remission.

The primary outcomes evaluated in the study were relapse and 5-year relapse-free survival.

People were followed for a median of 4.6 years after complete remission. During the follow-up period, 11.4% experienced relapse. In comparison, recent studies in HIV-negative people report relapse rates of 6-10% for DLBCL and 12% for Burkitt lymphoma using similar treatment regimens to those employed in this study population.

Five-year relapse-free survival was 88.4% for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, 88.9% for Burkitt lymphoma and 88.6% for plasmablastic lymphoma. Survival was much lower for unclassified AIDS lymphoma (57.1%) and the investigators say that these hard-to-classify lymphomas may include especially aggressive atypical lymphomas.

The following factors were associated with relapse:

  • Higher Ann Arbor score, representing more disseminated disease (stages III/IV) (hazard ratio 4.85, 95% CI 1.44-16.34)
  • No antiretroviral therapy during chemotherapy (HR 4.28, 95% CI 1.19-15.39)
  • R-CHOP chemotherapy (HR 7.59, 95% CI 1.87-30.81)
  • Non-classifiable lymphoma (HR 5.08, 95% CI 1.13-22.08)

The treatment regimens used – R-CHOP or GMALL – last up to four months. GMALL is more intensive and may require in-patient care. Reductions in doses or the number of cycles of chemotherapy may be necessary or advisable depending on the lymphoma stage and general health.

Looking at the treatment course, investigators found that only 37% of patients had a full treatment course, without delay, after diagnosis. There was no difference in outcome in those who received shorter courses of treatment or lower doses for either the R-CHOP or GMALL regimens.

The investigators concluded that “treatment outcomes compare favourably with those patients with NHL [non-Hodgkin lymphoma] and no HIV infection.”

Reference

Schommers P et al. Incidence and risk factors for relapses in HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma as observed in the German HIV-related lymphoma cohort study. Haematologica, published online in advance of print, 8 February 2018. http://doi:10.3324/haematol.2017.180893

Related news selected from other sources

More editors' picks on cancer >
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.