Isoniazid preventive treatment reduces the risk of death by 37% in people living with HIV

Anani Badje at CROI 2017. Photo credit: Robb Cohen Photography & Video
Keith Alcorn
Published: 16 February 2017

A six-month course of isoniazid preventive treatment (IPT) at the beginning of the Temprano trial in Ivory Coast reduced the risk of death by 37% over a mean follow-up period of 4.5 years, Anani Badje reported at the 2017 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Seattle on Wednesday.

Isoniazid is a drug used in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB), which can also prevent the development of active TB in people with latent TB. People exposed to a person with active TB may acquire an infection that is kept in check by the immune system. This latent infection may develop into active TB if immunity is depleted, whether through malnutrition, ageing or HIV infection.

Several large trials have shown that IPT reduces the risk of TB and death in people with HIV infection not taking antiretroviral therapy, but the largest of these studies suggested a need for continuous IPT in people not taking antiretroviral therapy. A randomised study in people taking antiretroviral therapy in South Africa showed that one year of IPT reduced the risk of TB by 37% during the one-year study period, but provided no information about long-term protection.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended a 36-month course of IPT for people living with HIV in 2011.

Subsequently, the Temprano ANRS 12136 study showed that a six-month course of IPT reduced the risk of any severe HIV-related illness of death by 35%, independent of antiretroviral therapy.

The Temprano ANRS 12136 study assessed two interventions:

  • Immediate antiretroviral treatment compared to starting treatment according to WHO guidelines between 2008 and 2012
  • Isoniazid for the prevention of tuberculosis compared to placebo.

Participants were randomised to each intervention arm, so the study was able to provide independent comparisons of the effects of antiretroviral therapy and IPT on survival and morbidity.

The Temprano study followed participants for 30 months, after which everyone in the study was offered immediate antiretroviral therapy. Participants were then followed for a further 30 months to monitor survival.

Anani Badje of INSERM, Bordeaux, presented the results of long-term follow-up of Temprano participants.

The study randomised 2056 people, 42% of whom had CD4 cell counts above 500 cells/mm3, to receive isoniazid or placebo for six months. Approximately 35% in each arm showed evidence of previous exposure to TB on the Quantiferon Gold assay, and 3% had a previous history of TB.

During the follow-up period 7.3% of participants were lost to follow-up and a total of 10.7% in the no-IPT group and 9.4% in the IPT group were lost to follow-up during the trial and its follow-up period.

The 6-year probability of death was 6.9% in the no-IPT group (95% confidence interval 5.1%-9.2%) and 4.1% in the IPT group (95% CI 2.9%-5.7%). IPT reduced the risk of death by 37% (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97).

Kapalan-Meier analysis, which plots the cumulative probability of death over time, shows that the difference in the risk of death appeared to increase over time.

Why should isoniazid have such a prolonged effect on the risk of death in this study compared to previous trials? Unfortunately, the Temprano study investigators are unable to collect data on causes of death in the follow-up period because participants reverted to standard medical care, and medical history information was inconsistent. The lack of information on causes of death makes it impossible to judge whether the risk of TB continued to be lower in the IPT group throughout the follow-up period, as it was during the clinical trial phase.

It is possible that IPT may have a greater effect in people with higher CD4 cell counts; in the Temprano study the mean CD4 cell count at month 60 of follow-up was 655 cells/mm3. Furthermore, IPT might provide a form of bridging protection prior to the improvement of TB-specific immunity on antiretroviral therapy (90% of people in the IPT arm of the study eventually started antiretroviral treatment). IPT might also have a more durable effect in settings with a lower rate of TB transmission. For example, a study in Brazil found that IPT reduced the risk of TB over seven years of follow-up.

Dr Badje said that the study findings provide strong evidence of the merits of IPT to countries that are still reluctant to recommend it for people living with HIV. Fears that IPT will lead to isoniazid resistance if people with undiagnosed active TB are treated have proved unfounded, he told a press conference. A strong and clear policy for implementation of IPT is needed in order to overcome reluctance among health care providers, he said. 

Reference

Badje A et al. Six-month IPT reduces mortality independently of ART in African adults with high CD4. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2017), Seattle, abstract 78, 2017.

View the abstract on the conference website.

View a webcast of this presentation on the conference website.

NAM's coverage of CROI 2017 has been made possible thanks to support from Janssen and ViiV Healthcare.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.