A comparison of HIV-positive and HIV-negative male veterans in the United States found that HIV infection conferred an independent but "modest" risk of fragility fractures in the hip and spine, delegates at the 17th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in San Francisco heard on Thursday.
But a second study, in a separate cohort, found that younger, pre-menopausal women with HIV did not have an elevated risk of fractures when compared to HIV-negative women of a similar age.
Loss of bone density (osteoporosis and osteopenia) is prevalent amongst people with HIV, yet relatively little is known about how HIV affects the risk of of bone fracture.
Several previous studies (though not all) have found higher rates of wrist, hip and vertebral fractures in individuals with HIV, compared to age- and sex-matched HIV-negative controls.
But these studies have not always controlled for other significant risk factors, such as body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake, and other physical and mental illnesses.
In this retrospective analysis, investigators from the US Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) compared the risk of fragility fractures between 40,079 HIV-positive and 79,080 HIV-negative men enrolled in the VACS observational cohort between 1997 and 2009.
Fragility fractures are those that occur with minimal impact or trauma, typically at the wrist, vertebrae, or femoral head of the hip. The two groups were racially diverse, entirely male, and had very similar demographic and health characteristics except for HIV status.
Only first fractures at the characteristic fragility fracture sites (wrist, spine and hip) were considered. Initial analysis found wrist fractures to be common amongst younger participants, with no statistically significant difference according to HIV status. The investigators therefore chose to exclude the 1233 wrist fractures from all analyses.
With this exclusion, a total of 919 fragility fractures were observed, 297 vertebral and 622 hip, during a median of eight years follow-up. Mean age at the time of fracture was 55 years.
The first, unadjusted analysis showed that fractures were 53% more likely among patients with HIV (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 1.75).
A multivariate analysis was then done to adjust for race, low body weight, alcohol use, and other known risk factors. (However, data on smoking, family history, and bone density level were not included in the analysis.) HIV remained significantly associated with a 38% increased risk of fragility fracture (HR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.18–1.60). The following other risk factors were also identified:
- low body weight (cachexia): HR = 2.83; 95% CI, 2.26–3.54
- cerebrovascular disease: HR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.34–2.65
- white race: HR = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.57–2.04
- alcohol abuse: HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.42–2.10
- older age: HR = 1.53 per decade; 95% CI, 1.44–1.63
- enrolment before 1999 (protective): HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64–0.87
A final multivariate analysis of the HIV-positive cohort found no significant effect due to tenofovir (Viread), stavudine (d4T, Zerit), NNRTI or protease inhibitor use at baseline; however, higher CD4 cell counts were slightly protective (HR = 0.96 per each additional 100 cells/mm3; 95% CI, 0.91–0.99).
As this cohort was composed entirely of men, no inferences could be made regarding HIV-positive women. A second study, of HIV-positive women, is discussed below.
In a related press conference, lead investigator Julie Womack commented that the level of risk purely due to HIV infection was more modest than that found in other studies, but still appeared to be an independent factor and a contributor to greater overall risk. (Jules Levin, of the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project, contested the term "modest", as fractures are serious and their prevalence will only increase as people with HIV age.)
Womack also noted that their observed fracture rates could include some fractures due to trauma rather than fragility and could therefore be overestimates.
Andrew Carr (of St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney) questioned why cumulative exposure to ART was not investigated instead of the snapshot of use at baseline, stating that "you can't definitively say it's HIV-related if you haven't eliminated the possibility that it's ART-related."
Womack felt that HIV infection alone did not merit DEXA bone density scans, and stated that "most" fragility fractures happened in people who did not have osteopenia or osteoporosis. DEXA, she said, "might be indicated for persons with moderate to high risk for fragility fracture."
However, Womack also recommended that "all people at risk" should be encouraged to start appropriate protective measures such as weight-bearing exercise, vitamin D supplementation and smoking cessation. Asked to clarify who should be considered "at risk", she told aidsmap that she would recommend preventive measures for people with any known risk factor or factors, including HIV infection.