Early
weaning resulted in almost twice as many acute illnesses and hospitalisations
among HIV-exposed uninfected infants when compared to infants who continued to
be breastfed beyond six months of age, long-term follow-up of the PEPI-Malawi
study of extended infant antiretroviral prophylaxis has shown.
However, the difference only became apparent after 12 months of age, suggesting that both breastfeeding and antiretroviral prophylaxis beyond 12 months of age - the currently recommended milestone for HIV-positive mothers to begin weaning uninfected infants - ought to be evaluated by studies of longer breastfeeding and prophylactic regimens.
The
findings are published in the August 15 edition of Clinical Infectious Diseases.
At
15 months of age 6.4% of infants weaned early had died compared to 3.5%
of those still breastfeeding (p= 0.03).
Improving
the survival of infants born to mothers with HIV who remain uninfected is a
serious challenge in sub-Saharan Africa.
Studies
in Malawi, Uganda and Botswana have shown how early weaning (at 4-6 months of
age) to prevent HIV transmission compared to breastfeeding for longer periods
has resulted in severe diarrhoea and death, acute malnutrition and/or stunted
growth. Additionally, stopping breastfeeding has not improved HIV-free survival
(remaining alive and being free of HIV infection).
Balancing
the risks and benefits of breastfeeding in resource-poor settings where safe
alternatives are rare has been the subject of lengthy debate.
Breastfeeding
provides many protective factors including complete nutritional requirements
and is vital to survival in resource-poor settings especially in the first few
months of life. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends breastfeeding
for 12 months or longer.
The
authors note that while evidence from resource-poor setting shows the increased
risk of death and disease from not breastfeeding, the timing of these events is
poorly understood.
In
the interests of programme planning and clinical management the authors stress
the importance of knowing the immediate and long-term effects of early weaning.
They
hypothesise that stopping breastfeeding to prevent HIV transmission “leads to
early acute morbidity that occurs during the process of weaning or immediately
after weaning.” They recognise that
death linked to weaning happens late and after the process of weaning is
completed.
The
authors chose to look at rates of illness and/or hospitalisation among
HIV-exposed, uninfected Malawian infants in follow-up periods of three months
after weaning took place and to determine the cumulative death rates over time.
The infants were part of the PEPI-Malawi trial.
The
PEPI-Malawi trial took place from 2004 to 2009 to determine the efficacy of
extended infant antiretroviral prophylaxis for up to 14 weeks after birth to
reduce HIV transmission after birth. The study showed that 14 weeks of infant antiretroviral prophylaxis had a greater protective effect than single dose nevirapine plus one week of AZT.
The
infants and their mothers were seen at birth and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 14 weeks of
age. After 14 weeks follow-up visits were at six months of age and then every
three months until 2 years of age.
Mothers
in the trial were advised to stop breastfeeding by six months. The
characteristics of the mothers in the groups were similar and remained constant
over time. However, more women in the NBF group had CD4 cell counts at baseline
under 250 cells/mm3 than in the BF group.
This
analysis included HIV-uninfected infants at six months of age. Breastfeeding and illness and or hospital
admission and malnutrition (defined as weight for age Z score of or less than
two) were compared during the age intervals of 6-9 months, 9-12 months and
12-15 months.
Breastfeeding
(BF) was defined as any breastfeeding at the start and end of the interval, and
no breastfeeding was defined as no breastfeeding (NBF) at any time during the interval.
Among
1761 infants, after controlling for extended antiretroviral infant prophylaxis,
infant cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and maternal HIV disease stage, the rate
ratios for illnesses and/or hospital admissions for NBF compared to BF at 6-9
months, 9-12 months and 12-15 months were 1.7, p<0.0001, 1.66, p=0.0001 and
1.75, p=0.0008, respectively.
No
breastfeeding was consistently and significantly associated with a higher risk
of illness and/or hospitalisation.
The
authors note these findings support their hypothesis and suggest “that the adverse
effects of weaning occur quickly and manifest as acute events resulting in
clinic visit or hospital admission.”
While
death rates were similar between the BF and NBF groups during the 6-12 month
age interval the risk of death was significantly higher in the NBF group during
12-15 months of age. This finding, the authors note, reinforces that of another
study, which showed that stopping BF early was associated with increased
mortality that continued into the second year of life in HIV-exposed,
uninfected African children.
The
authors also note the apparent association of cotrimoxazole
prophylaxis (CTXP) with lower frequency of illnesses and /or admissions at each
age interval for these infants. Evidence has shown the benefits of CTXP in
HIV-infected infants and adults, while studies in HIV-exposed, uninfected
infants are lacking.
A
clinical trial (the PROMISE study) will begin soon that will determine if
extended CTXP can reduce death and disease after stopping breastfeeding among
HIV-exposed, uninfected infants.
The
authors suggest a potential bias of excluding infants who became HIV-infected
during the follow-up period, as most of these were in the BF group.
They
also note the issue of reverse causality that is common to breastfeeding
studies. Illness, for example, may lead mothers to stop breastfeeding and as
such is the cause of not breastfeeding rather than the result.
The
authors conclude “with the introduction of maternal antiretrovirals for both
prophylaxis and treatment, breastfeeding duration could be extended. The impact
of these changes on child health needs to be evaluated. In settings similar to Malawi, where
the background rates of illness and death are high, inexpensive preventive
strategies such as cotrimoxazole prophylaxis of HIV-exposed, uninfected
children during and after weaning, should be considered.”