The novel integrase inhibitor
dolutegravir is among the most potent antiretroviral agents studied to date,
but treatment-experienced individuals with resistance to raltegravir need to take it twice-daily in order to
achieve optimal concentrations, according to findings presented yesterday at
the 13th European AIDS Conference (EACS) in Belgrade.
Dolutegravir (formerly S/GSK1349572
or GSK572) is a next generation integrase
inhibitor that remains active against HIV that has developed resistance to the
sole approved drug in its class, raltegravir (Isentress).
In the original VIKING study (Cohort
I), previously treated patients with extensive drug resistance were treated
with 50mg once-daily oral dolutegravir as "functional monotherapy"
for ten days, then added an optimised background regimen and continued through
week 24.
Although viral suppression was good
overall, pharmacokinetic modelling suggested better response might be achieved
with higher drug exposure, especially for people with a specific unfavourable
pattern of raltegravir
resistance mutations.
But drug concentrations reached a
plateau when researchers tried to administer larger once-daily doses, leading
them to instead test 50mg twice-daily administration in a second group of
patients (Cohort II). Again, participants received dolutegravir for ten days
then added an optimised regimen through week 24.
As presented by Vincent Soriano from Hospital Carlos
III in Madrid, this open-label,
single-arm trial enrolled 24 participants on failing antiretroviral therapy with pre-existing resistance to
raltegravir and any two other antiretroviral classes. They were required to
have at least one available fully active drug to add for regimen optimisation.
Most participants (75%) were men and
the median age was 47 years. They were generally similar to people in the
original Cohort I, except they had less advanced HIV disease and were more
likely to be coinfected with hepatitis B or C (about 20%). The median CD4 cell
count was about 200 cells/mm3. They had been taking antiretrovirals
for a median of 15 years and had used a median of 15 different drugs; half were
already resistant to the newest available agents.
Participants were divided into two
groups based on integrase resistance pattern at baseline; 46% had the Q148
mutation plus at least 1 secondary mutation¾which significantly reduces susceptibility
to dolutegravir¾whilst 54% had all other mutation patterns combined.
At 24 weeks 75% of participants
receiving twice-daily dolutegravir achieved undetectable viral load below 50
copies/mL, compared with just 41% of those who took the drug once-daily in
Cohort I. As expected, people who had more available active drugs for
optimisation did better (67% undetectable with one active drug, 79% with two).
Six
participants were classified as nonresponders: four who never suppressed viral
load through week 24, one who did so but then experienced viral rebound, and
one protocol violation; there were no discontinuations due to adverse events
and no deaths in Cohort II. Dolutegravir was well-tolerated overall, with the
most common side-effect being mild diarrhoea.
In a
multivariate analysis of Cohort I and Cohort II combined, factors that
independently predicted response to dolutegravir at 24 weeks were baseline
integrase resistance mutation pattern, availability of other active drugs for
optimisation, higher baseline CD4 cell count and dolutegravir concentration in
the blood at day 10.
Based on
these findings, 50mg twice-daily dolutegravir was chosen for further evaluation
in a Phase 3 trial. Soriano said an expanded access program is expected to
begin in early 2012.
As
raltegravir must also be give twice-daily, this dosing frequency does not put
dolutegravir as a disadvantage in an era when people with HIV and their
clinicians favour once-daily therapy.
Data from
the SPRING-1 study showed that once-daily dolutegravir is adequate for
treatment-naive individuals, however, suggesting that this is another drug that
will be dosed differently depending on prior treatment history.