Difficulties meeting pharmacy costs and
those incurred travelling for clinic appointments are associated with
interrupting or stopping HIV therapy, Australian investigators report in HIV Medicine.
Overall, 14% of patients reported that they
had interrupted treatment and 9% that they had stopped their HIV treatment because of
pharmacy costs.
“Both delaying and stopping were
significantly associated with meeting pharmacy costs and difficulty meeting
travel costs,” write the authors.
Antiretroviral therapy requires high levels
of adherence. Research conducted in some resource-limited countries has shown
that an inability to meet pharmacy costs or those associated with travel to
medical facilities are associated with poorer adherence to therapy.
Little is known about the association
between financial pressures and adherence in richer countries.
Australia provides government subsidised
antiretroviral treatment to all its citizens as well as those with the right to
permanent residence. However, patients are required to pay a contribution
towards the cost of their medication. This co-payment amount to 17% of the cost
of medication. It is capped at AUS$336 per year for pensioners and individuals
with a right to concessions and AUS$1317 for all others.
Doctors from St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney,
wanted to see if the cost of obtaining medication was associated with the
interruption or cessation of antiretroviral treatment.
Between November 2010 and May 2011,
patients attending the hospital’s HIV out-patient clinic were asked to complete
a questionnaire enquiring about these issues.
The questionnaire was completed by 335 HIV-positive
patients, and 10% were co-infected with hepatitis C. The patients had a mean
age of 52 years and 76% attended the clinic every three to six months.
In all 19% of patients stated that it was
difficult (16%) or very difficult (3%)
to afford pharmacy dispensing costs. In addition, 6% reported that they had
problems paying for travel to the hospital for their follow-up appointments.
Some 14% of patients reported that they had
delayed obtaining medication because of pharmacy costs and 9% said they had
stopped their HIV therapy because of these costs.
Therapy was stopped by 29% of patients who
found it difficult to pay for their medication. However, only 4% of individuals
who were not experiencing financial stress ceased taking their antiretrovirals.
The investigators found that difficulties
paying pharmacy costs were associated with interrupting and ceasing therapy
(both p < 0.001). In addition, patients with problems paying for travel to
the clinic were also significantly more likely to interrupt (p < 0.001) or
stop (p = 0.05) their treatment.
Most of the patients participating in the
study reported that questions about adherence formed part of their routine
clinic appointments. Sixty percent said they were usually asked if they had
missed any doses and 54% said that they were asked if their medication caused
side-effects.
In contrast, only 5% of patients were asked
if they were experiencing problems paying for their treatment.
“Increased direct questioning about
financial stress is appropriate and might help identify patients at greater
risk of poor adherence,” suggest the authors. “The data also suggest that
patients reporting financial stress, including those in a wealthy country such
as Australia…might have better ART [antiretroviral therapy] adherence with a
greater degree of financial assistance.”
Indeed, the investigators believe that
Australia is unlikely to be the only richer country where patients are having
difficulty paying their contribution towards the cost of HIV medication.
Co-payment is also required in the USA, Canada and Switzerland.
“Our data suggest that financial stress and
its relationship to ART adherence should be ascertained in all patients
receiving ART,” conclude the investigators. “The relationship between financial
stress and treatment failure (loss to follow-up, virological failure, cessation
of ART, and cessation of other medications, especially those used for the
prevention of comorbid disease) should be formally evaluated in a prospective
study.”